A prospective comparison of two computer aided detection systems with different false positive rates in colonoscopy

This study evaluated the impact of differing false positive (FP) rates in two computer-aided detection (CADe) systems on the clinical effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy. The primary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). The ADR in the control, system A (3.2% FP rate), and system B (0.6% FP rate) groups were 44.3%, 43.4%, and 50.4%, respectively, with system B showing a significantly higher ADR than the control group. The APC for the control, A, and B groups were 0.75, 0.83, and 0.90, respectively, with system B also showing a higher APC than the control. The non-true lesion resection rates were 23.8%, 29.2%, and 21.3%, with system B having the lowest. The system with lower FP rates demonstrated improved ADR and APC without increasing the resection of non-neoplastic lesions. These findings suggest that higher FP rates negatively affect the clinical performance of AI-assisted colonoscopy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01334-y
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective comparison of two computer aided detection systems with different false positive rates in colonoscopy

Seon Hee Lim, Hae Yeon Kang, Ji Hyun Song, Jung Ho Bae et al.
15 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
4.24
article

A prospective comparison of two computer aided detection systems with different false positive rates in colonoscopy

Seon Hee Lim, Hae Yeon Kang, Ji Hyun Song, Jung Ho Bae, Ji Yeon Seo, Goh Eun Chung, Sun Young Yang, Jung Oh Kim, Jooyoung Lee, Ji Min Choi
article en
15 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of differing false positive (FP) rates in two computer-aided detection (CADe) systems on the clinical effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy. The primary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). The ADR in the control, system A (3.2% FP rate), and system B (0.6% FP rate) groups were 44.3%, 43.4%, and 50.4%, respectively, with system B showing a significantly higher ADR than the control group. The APC for the control, A, and B groups were 0.75, 0.83, and 0.90, respectively, with system B also showing a higher APC than the control. The non-true lesion resection rates were 23.8%, 29.2%, and 21.3%, with system B having the lowest. The system with lower FP rates demonstrated improved ADR and APC without increasing the resection of non-neoplastic lesions. These findings suggest that higher FP rates negatively affect the clinical performance of AI-assisted colonoscopy.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Seoul National University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.