The Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section Compared to Permanent Section: A Single Center Study in Nepal Mediciti Hospital

Frozen section plays a major role in the surgical management of patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease. Since its introduction in the late 20th century, the use of frozen section has spectacularly increased. It provides the surgeon with important pathologic information while the patient is on the operating table. There are many indications for performing frozen section, including determination of the nature and extent of a lesion, evaluation of surgical margins and assessment of adequacy of tissue for diagnosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections over a 2-year period in a Department of Laboratory medicine and Pathology, Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Sainbu, Lalitpur, Nepal. It retrospectively reviewed frozen sections performed in the Pathology Department of Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal for 2 years. The results were compared to the permanent sections to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, of frozen section test. Discordant cases were reassessed to find the reasons for discrepancy. It evaluated a total of N=100 frozen section specimens. In two specimens (2%) the diagnoses were deferred, of the remaining 98 specimens, four specimen (4.0%) were discordant and 94 specimen (94%) were concordant to permanent diagnoses. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the frozen section compared to permanent section (as gold standard) were 100 %, 96.6 %, 100 % and 96.6 % respectively. Among the 4 discordant diagnoses, two (2%) were due to sampling error and two (2 %) were due to interpretative errors. Adequate and accurate sampling is recommended and also interpretation error should be minimized to help reducing the rate of discordant cases. The results of this study also confirm that the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in our institution compares well with internationally published data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dinkum Journal of Medical Innovations
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71017/djmi.3.8.d-0306
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section Compared to Permanent Section: A Single Center Study in Nepal Mediciti Hospital

Aryal Gopi, Acharya Shoshan
1 citations
Dinkum Journal of Medical Innovations
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
0.28
article

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section Compared to Permanent Section: A Single Center Study in Nepal Mediciti Hospital

Aryal Gopi, Acharya Shoshan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Frozen section plays a major role in the surgical management of patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease. Since its introduction in the late 20th century, the use of frozen section has spectacularly increased. It provides the surgeon with important pathologic information while the patient is on the operating table. There are many indications for performing frozen section, including determination of the nature and extent of a lesion, evaluation of surgical margins and assessment of adequacy of tissue for diagnosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections over a 2-year period in a Department of Laboratory medicine and Pathology, Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Sainbu, Lalitpur, Nepal. It retrospectively reviewed frozen sections performed in the Pathology Department of Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal for 2 years. The results were compared to the permanent sections to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, of frozen section test. Discordant cases were reassessed to find the reasons for discrepancy. It evaluated a total of N=100 frozen section specimens. In two specimens (2%) the diagnoses were deferred, of the remaining 98 specimens, four specimen (4.0%) were discordant and 94 specimen (94%) were concordant to permanent diagnoses. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the frozen section compared to permanent section (as gold standard) were 100 %, 96.6 %, 100 % and 96.6 % respectively. Among the 4 discordant diagnoses, two (2%) were due to sampling error and two (2 %) were due to interpretative errors. Adequate and accurate sampling is recommended and also interpretation error should be minimized to help reducing the rate of discordant cases. The results of this study also confirm that the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in our institution compares well with internationally published data.

Dinkum Journal of Medical InnovationsVol. 3(08)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section Compared to Permanent Section: A Single Center Study in Nepal Mediciti Hospital — Aryal Gopi, Acharya Shoshan · Dinkum Journal of Medical Innovations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS