Procedural pain management in an academic emergency department, a pilot study

Pain is the leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits and untreated acute pain can frequently transition to chronic pain. (1,2) A 2020 pilot study showed that an ED-physician-led procedural pain management program reduced pain. (3) Our objective was to determine the feasibility and usefulness of a Mobile ED (MED) Pain Management program led by a dual-trained Pain Management and Emergency physician. We included adult patients who visited the ED at a large academic hospital between October 26th and November 17th, 2020. Patients had a variety of types of pain and were treated with bedside nerve blocks. We recorded procedure indication, demographic data, and pre-and-post Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. We also captured patient and provider satisfaction, and billing data. The MED team was available for a total of 30 h and performed 14 procedures on 12 patients and 4 consults without procedures on 4 additional patients. VAS 30-min score reductions ranged from 20 % (intercostal nerve blocks) to 100 % erector spinae plane block (ESPB). The average VAS pain reduction was 58 %. The most common procedure performed was the ESPB with mean VAS pain reduction of 74 %. The procedures and consults produced 50.13 RVUs total and work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) of 29.4. Average RVU was 3.13 (1.84 wRVU) per patient and 1.67 RVU (0.98 wRVU) per hour. These preliminary data suggest that although implementation of a dedicated ED pain could potentially lead to improved pain relief, it may not be financially feasible in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JEM Reports
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemrpt.2024.100134
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedural pain management in an academic emergency department, a pilot study

Irvan J. Bubic, Christopher J. Coyne, Sidra L. Speaker, Jessica Oswald
JEM Reports
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Procedural pain management in an academic emergency department, a pilot study

Irvan J. Bubic, Christopher J. Coyne, Sidra L. Speaker, Jessica Oswald
article en

Abstract

Pain is the leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits and untreated acute pain can frequently transition to chronic pain. (1,2) A 2020 pilot study showed that an ED-physician-led procedural pain management program reduced pain. (3) Our objective was to determine the feasibility and usefulness of a Mobile ED (MED) Pain Management program led by a dual-trained Pain Management and Emergency physician. We included adult patients who visited the ED at a large academic hospital between October 26th and November 17th, 2020. Patients had a variety of types of pain and were treated with bedside nerve blocks. We recorded procedure indication, demographic data, and pre-and-post Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. We also captured patient and provider satisfaction, and billing data. The MED team was available for a total of 30 h and performed 14 procedures on 12 patients and 4 consults without procedures on 4 additional patients. VAS 30-min score reductions ranged from 20 % (intercostal nerve blocks) to 100 % erector spinae plane block (ESPB). The average VAS pain reduction was 58 %. The most common procedure performed was the ESPB with mean VAS pain reduction of 74 %. The procedures and consults produced 50.13 RVUs total and work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) of 29.4. Average RVU was 3.13 (1.84 wRVU) per patient and 1.67 RVU (0.98 wRVU) per hour. These preliminary data suggest that although implementation of a dedicated ED pain could potentially lead to improved pain relief, it may not be financially feasible in this setting.

JEM ReportsVol. 4(1)
University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.