Dignidad y persona. Líneas jurisprudenciales en el discurso de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

This paper analyzes how the term dignity appears in relation to the term person in the discourse of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It emphasizes the paragraphs in which the Interamerican Court has referred to both notions and the formulas it uses in this regard, aiming to expose dynamic relationships between them. The purpose is to detect and describe the formulas in which these terms appear in the Court’s discourse over time, in relation to specific factual scenarios and the interaction between the paragraphs containing those formulas. The hypothesis guiding this paper is that, although these formulas are relevant in the Court’s judgments and opinions to support arguments, they do not possess concrete content with directives on how to put into practice the human rights in question or how to interpret what it means for a person to have dignity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Precedente Revista Jurídica
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v25.6826
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dignidad y persona. Líneas jurisprudenciales en el discurso de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Helga María Lell
Precedente Revista Jurídica
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

Dignidad y persona. Líneas jurisprudenciales en el discurso de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Helga María Lell
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes how the term dignity appears in relation to the term person in the discourse of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It emphasizes the paragraphs in which the Interamerican Court has referred to both notions and the formulas it uses in this regard, aiming to expose dynamic relationships between them. The purpose is to detect and describe the formulas in which these terms appear in the Court’s discourse over time, in relation to specific factual scenarios and the interaction between the paragraphs containing those formulas. The hypothesis guiding this paper is that, although these formulas are relevant in the Court’s judgments and opinions to support arguments, they do not possess concrete content with directives on how to put into practice the human rights in question or how to interpret what it means for a person to have dignity.

Precedente Revista JurídicaVol. 25
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad Nacional de La Pampa (AR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dignidad y persona. Líneas jurisprudenciales en el discurso de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos — Helga María Lell · Precedente Revista Jurídica (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS