N-N compounds in L2 French and L3 English

Abstract This study considers the acquisition of nominal compounding in L2 French and L3 English among L1 Arabic speakers. Arabic N‑N compounds have the structure [N Head -N Modifier ]; English has the structure [N Modifier -N Head ]. French uses phrasal compounds [N-PP], also found in Arabic and English. The participants completed a forced-choice selection task. In L2 French, the L2 beginners converged with the L1 French speakers regarding phrasal compounds; however, they significantly transferred the Arabic N-N. L1 Arabic had (non)-facilitative influence on L2 French. In contrast, the advanced L2 learners showed nativelike performance in using both structures. In L3 English, the L3 beginners used phrasal compounds and L1 N‑N forms, supporting the L1 transfer scenario and the Linguistic Proximity Model in early L3 acquisition. In the L3 advanced stage, proficiency overrode native non-facilitative transfer. Overall, the findings support surface overlap and derivation simplicity as predictors of transfer in L2 and L3 acquisition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Second Language Studies
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00040.her
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

N-N compounds in L2 French and L3 English

Abdelkader Hermas
2 citations
Journal of Second Language Studies
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
1.58
article

N-N compounds in L2 French and L3 English

Abdelkader Hermas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study considers the acquisition of nominal compounding in L2 French and L3 English among L1 Arabic speakers. Arabic N‑N compounds have the structure [N Head -N Modifier ]; English has the structure [N Modifier -N Head ]. French uses phrasal compounds [N-PP], also found in Arabic and English. The participants completed a forced-choice selection task. In L2 French, the L2 beginners converged with the L1 French speakers regarding phrasal compounds; however, they significantly transferred the Arabic N-N. L1 Arabic had (non)-facilitative influence on L2 French. In contrast, the advanced L2 learners showed nativelike performance in using both structures. In L3 English, the L3 beginners used phrasal compounds and L1 N‑N forms, supporting the L1 transfer scenario and the Linguistic Proximity Model in early L3 acquisition. In the L3 advanced stage, proficiency overrode native non-facilitative transfer. Overall, the findings support surface overlap and derivation simplicity as predictors of transfer in L2 and L3 acquisition.

Journal of Second Language StudiesVol. 8(1)
Université Ibn Zohr (MA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

N-N compounds in L2 French and L3 English — Abdelkader Hermas · Journal of Second Language Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS