A Personal Touch: Intergovernmental Organizations and the Mechanism for Mayor-to-Mayor Relationships

Much of the research on intergovernmental cooperation starts with cities that are already in a relationship or are co-participants in an intergovernmental organization and then look at which relationships get developed into cooperative agreements. In this article, four potential methods by which local officials might form those precursor relations are tested. First, cities work within a network context where intergovernmental organizations might matter for several reasons. The intergovernmental organization might reflect similarity in the organizations, called homophily. Second and third, existing intergovernmental organizations may matter directly by serving as a social focus, or a Tertius Iungens. Finally, the professionalism of local government could lead to intergovernmental contact. This study uses a statewide network of Kentucky officials (mayors) and intergovernmental organizations, in two periods (2011 and 2015), to show that shared intergovernmental institutions and mayoral intergovernmental participation predicts inter official relationships. Shared characteristics of cities and physical proximity do not predict communication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Commonwealth Review of Political Science
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61611/2994-0044.1052
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Personal Touch: Intergovernmental Organizations and the Mechanism for Mayor-to-Mayor Relationships

Michael D. Howell
Commonwealth Review of Political Science
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

A Personal Touch: Intergovernmental Organizations and the Mechanism for Mayor-to-Mayor Relationships

Michael D. Howell
article en

Abstract

Much of the research on intergovernmental cooperation starts with cities that are already in a relationship or are co-participants in an intergovernmental organization and then look at which relationships get developed into cooperative agreements. In this article, four potential methods by which local officials might form those precursor relations are tested. First, cities work within a network context where intergovernmental organizations might matter for several reasons. The intergovernmental organization might reflect similarity in the organizations, called homophily. Second and third, existing intergovernmental organizations may matter directly by serving as a social focus, or a Tertius Iungens. Finally, the professionalism of local government could lead to intergovernmental contact. This study uses a statewide network of Kentucky officials (mayors) and intergovernmental organizations, in two periods (2011 and 2015), to show that shared intergovernmental institutions and mayoral intergovernmental participation predicts inter official relationships. Shared characteristics of cities and physical proximity do not predict communication.

Commonwealth Review of Political ScienceVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Personal Touch: Intergovernmental Organizations and the Mechanism for Mayor-to-Mayor Relationships — Michael D. Howell · Commonwealth Review of Political Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS