The Impact of Regional Attachment on Interpersonal Trust

How much individuals trust others politically, and who they trust, remains an intriguing question for social science researchers. Previous research indicates that levels of political trust demonstrated by individuals often vary based on a variety of factors, such as gender, age, race, ethnicity, religion, social class, ideology, and partisanship. However, one area of political trust that has remained surprisingly unexplored has been the impact of regional identity, particularly among Southerners. My theory is that, similar to the manner in which the aforementioned markers work, Southern regional identity activates stereotypes regarding trustworthiness and, thus, influences inter-regional trust decisions. As a result, we expect Southern regional identifiers to trust each other more than non-Southern regional identifiers. If this is indeed the case, this could have implications for the evaluation of politicians based on region, and could also impact levels of support surrounding issues of federalism, which often pit region against region.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Commonwealth Review of Political Science
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61611/2994-0044.1055
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Regional Attachment on Interpersonal Trust

Scott Lasley, Jeff Kash, Joel Turner
1 links
Commonwealth Review of Political Science
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

The Impact of Regional Attachment on Interpersonal Trust

Scott Lasley, Jeff Kash, Joel Turner
article en

Abstract

How much individuals trust others politically, and who they trust, remains an intriguing question for social science researchers. Previous research indicates that levels of political trust demonstrated by individuals often vary based on a variety of factors, such as gender, age, race, ethnicity, religion, social class, ideology, and partisanship. However, one area of political trust that has remained surprisingly unexplored has been the impact of regional identity, particularly among Southerners. My theory is that, similar to the manner in which the aforementioned markers work, Southern regional identity activates stereotypes regarding trustworthiness and, thus, influences inter-regional trust decisions. As a result, we expect Southern regional identifiers to trust each other more than non-Southern regional identifiers. If this is indeed the case, this could have implications for the evaluation of politicians based on region, and could also impact levels of support surrounding issues of federalism, which often pit region against region.

Commonwealth Review of Political ScienceVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.