Evaluating Material Failure with Synthetic Data and Machine Learning for Enhanced Predictive Accuracy

This study investigates the use of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting models to predict material failure based on stress and strain data. Both models achieved high accuracy, with Gradient Boosting slightly outperforming Random Forest in identifying failure cases, as demonstrated by a higher recall for the failure class. A decision boundary visualization reveals that the Random Forest model effectively separates failure and non-failure regions, though some misclassification persists. This comparative analysis, supported by confusion matrices and classification reports, highlights the strengths and limitations of each model in capturing failure patterns. Future work includes exploring additional features, advanced algorithms, interpretability methods, and real-time monitoring systems to improve prediction accuracy and industrial applicability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.65703
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Material Failure with Synthetic Data and Machine Learning for Enhanced Predictive Accuracy

Ekta Singh
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Fault Detection and Control Systems
article

Evaluating Material Failure with Synthetic Data and Machine Learning for Enhanced Predictive Accuracy

Ekta Singh
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the use of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting models to predict material failure based on stress and strain data. Both models achieved high accuracy, with Gradient Boosting slightly outperforming Random Forest in identifying failure cases, as demonstrated by a higher recall for the failure class. A decision boundary visualization reveals that the Random Forest model effectively separates failure and non-failure regions, though some misclassification persists. This comparative analysis, supported by confusion matrices and classification reports, highlights the strengths and limitations of each model in capturing failure patterns. Future work includes exploring additional features, advanced algorithms, interpretability methods, and real-time monitoring systems to improve prediction accuracy and industrial applicability.

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 12(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.