Interpolation Techniques for Reconstructing Galactic Faraday Rotation

Abstract The line-of-sight structure of the Galactic magnetic field (GMF) can be studied using Faraday rotation measure (RM) grids. We analyze how the choice of interpolation kernel can affect the accuracy and reliability of reconstructed RM maps. We test the following kernels: inverse distance weighting (IDW), natural neighbor interpolation (NNI), inverse multiquadric interpolation (IM), thin-plate spline interpolation (TPS), and a Bayesian rotation measure sky (BRMS); all techniques were tested on two simulated Galactic foreground RMs (one assuming the GMF has patchy structures and the other assuming it has filamentary structures) using magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Both foregrounds were sampled to form RM grids with densities of ∼40 sources deg −2 and area ∼144 deg 2 . The techniques were tested on data sets with different noise levels and Gaussian random extragalactic RM contributions. The data set that most closely emulates expected data from current surveys, such as the POlarization Sky Survey of the Universe’s Magnetism (POSSUM), had extragalactic contributions and a noise standard deviation of ∼1.5 rad m −2 . For this data set, the accuracy of the techniques for the patchy structures is ranked from best to worst as BRMS, NNI, TPS, IDW, and IM; in the filamentary simulated foreground, the ordering is BRMS, NNI, TPS, and IDW. IDW is the most computationally expensive technique, while TPS and IM are the least expensive. BRMS and NNI have the same, intermediate computational cost. This analysis lays the groundwork for Galactic RM studies with large radio polarization sky surveys, such as POSSUM.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ddf
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpolation Techniques for Reconstructing Galactic Faraday Rotation

Ayush Pandhi, B. M. Gaensler, Sebastian Hutschenreuter, S. P. O’Sullivan et al.
2 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
0.66
article

Interpolation Techniques for Reconstructing Galactic Faraday Rotation

Ayush Pandhi, B. M. Gaensler, Sebastian Hutschenreuter, S. P. O’Sullivan, Jennifer West, Shannon Vanderwoude, Affan Khadir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The line-of-sight structure of the Galactic magnetic field (GMF) can be studied using Faraday rotation measure (RM) grids. We analyze how the choice of interpolation kernel can affect the accuracy and reliability of reconstructed RM maps. We test the following kernels: inverse distance weighting (IDW), natural neighbor interpolation (NNI), inverse multiquadric interpolation (IM), thin-plate spline interpolation (TPS), and a Bayesian rotation measure sky (BRMS); all techniques were tested on two simulated Galactic foreground RMs (one assuming the GMF has patchy structures and the other assuming it has filamentary structures) using magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Both foregrounds were sampled to form RM grids with densities of ∼40 sources deg −2 and area ∼144 deg 2 . The techniques were tested on data sets with different noise levels and Gaussian random extragalactic RM contributions. The data set that most closely emulates expected data from current surveys, such as the POlarization Sky Survey of the Universe’s Magnetism (POSSUM), had extragalactic contributions and a noise standard deviation of ∼1.5 rad m −2 . For this data set, the accuracy of the techniques for the patchy structures is ranked from best to worst as BRMS, NNI, TPS, IDW, and IM; in the filamentary simulated foreground, the ordering is BRMS, NNI, TPS, and IDW. IDW is the most computationally expensive technique, while TPS and IM are the least expensive. BRMS and NNI have the same, intermediate computational cost. This analysis lays the groundwork for Galactic RM studies with large radio polarization sky surveys, such as POSSUM.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 977(2)
Comunidad de Madrid, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, European Research Council, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.