Find the Optimal Solution or Approximate Optimal Solution in Interval Scheduling

The interval scheduling problem is a classic optimization challenge that finds broad applications in fields like resource allocation, job scheduling, and network management. This paper focuses on exploring strategies to obtain both optimal and approximate solutions to the problem. The research compares the effectiveness of greedy algorithms, which adhere to a local optimization strategy, with dynamic programming (DP) methods that consider global solutions by decomposing problems into sub-problems. Additionally, other heuristic approaches are discussed to handle situations where computational efficiency is crucial. The results show that greedy algorithms are efficient and appropriate for cases with specific structural characteristics, while dynamic programming provides more accurate solutions for complex problems but at a higher computational cost. The conclusion underscores the significance of selecting appropriate algorithms based on the trade-off between time efficiency and solution quality, providing practical guidelines for applying these strategies in real-world scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Computational Engineering
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2025.18476
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Find the Optimal Solution or Approximate Optimal Solution in Interval Scheduling

Suyu Liu
Applied and Computational Engineering
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
article

Find the Optimal Solution or Approximate Optimal Solution in Interval Scheduling

Suyu Liu
article en

Abstract

The interval scheduling problem is a classic optimization challenge that finds broad applications in fields like resource allocation, job scheduling, and network management. This paper focuses on exploring strategies to obtain both optimal and approximate solutions to the problem. The research compares the effectiveness of greedy algorithms, which adhere to a local optimization strategy, with dynamic programming (DP) methods that consider global solutions by decomposing problems into sub-problems. Additionally, other heuristic approaches are discussed to handle situations where computational efficiency is crucial. The results show that greedy algorithms are efficient and appropriate for cases with specific structural characteristics, while dynamic programming provides more accurate solutions for complex problems but at a higher computational cost. The conclusion underscores the significance of selecting appropriate algorithms based on the trade-off between time efficiency and solution quality, providing practical guidelines for applying these strategies in real-world scenarios.

Applied and Computational EngineeringVol. 115(1)
University of Birmingham (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.