Classroom Bullying: Understanding Bystander Reactions Across Different Bullying Types

School-based bullying is a widespread issue, but it occurs less often when bystanders defend the victims. This study examined whether type of bullying and students' trust in their teacher's ability to manage the class would be associated with reaction of the bystander (i.e. defending, passive, and pro-bullying). The participants were 202 ninth-grade students in Sweden, aged 15 years, who completed a questionnaire in their classroom. They were randomized to one of five vignettes depicting different types of bullying (direct/ostracism, indirect/ostracism, direct/devaluing, indirect/devaluation, and control condition) and imagined that the situation they read in the vignette happened to them. Students with higher trust in their teacher were more inclined to defend victims. Students reported more passive bystanding in indirect devaluing compared to direct ostracizing. Finally, type of bullying interacted with trust in the teacher on passive bystanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of School Violence
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2024.2442925
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classroom Bullying: Understanding Bystander Reactions Across Different Bullying Types

Robert Thornberg, Tomas Jungert, Jun Sung Hong, Sophie Berjot
4 citations
Journal of School Violence
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
2.57
article

Classroom Bullying: Understanding Bystander Reactions Across Different Bullying Types

Robert Thornberg, Tomas Jungert, Jun Sung Hong, Sophie Berjot
article en
4 citations

Abstract

School-based bullying is a widespread issue, but it occurs less often when bystanders defend the victims. This study examined whether type of bullying and students' trust in their teacher's ability to manage the class would be associated with reaction of the bystander (i.e. defending, passive, and pro-bullying). The participants were 202 ninth-grade students in Sweden, aged 15 years, who completed a questionnaire in their classroom. They were randomized to one of five vignettes depicting different types of bullying (direct/ostracism, indirect/ostracism, direct/devaluing, indirect/devaluation, and control condition) and imagined that the situation they read in the vignette happened to them. Students with higher trust in their teacher were more inclined to defend victims. Students reported more passive bystanding in indirect devaluing compared to direct ostracizing. Finally, type of bullying interacted with trust in the teacher on passive bystanding.

Journal of School ViolenceVol. 24(2)
Linköping University (SE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Wayne State University (US), Lund University (SE), Matrice Extracellulaire et Dynamique Cellulaire MEDyC (FR), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Crafoordska Stiftelsen, Lunds Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Classroom Bullying: Understanding Bystander Reactions Across Different Bullying Types — Robert Thornberg, Tomas Jungert, et al. · Journal of School Violence (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS