Integrating Payor-Segregated Outpatient Obstetrics and Gynecology Care Models: The Patient Perspective

Significant racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality as well as gynecologic outcomes persist in the United States. The role of ambulatory care in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), particularly in facilities that separate resident and attending care along payor (and de facto racial) lines, remains unclear. This study examines patient perspectives on payor-segregated health care delivery in an academic medical center (AMC) and opinions on possible integration.This is a qualitative study conducted at a single AMC with payor-segregated resident and attending outpatient sites. Interviews focused on patient perception of experience and value in outpatient OBGYN care, perspectives on the segregated care model, and attitudes about integration. Patients participated in a 30-minute semistructured interview with recruitment continuing until thematic saturation was reached (October 2022-August 2023). Interviews were coded using an integrated approach with grounded theory; 12% of transcripts were double-coded (<i>k</i> = 0.86).We interviewed 26 patients (16 from resident, 10 from attending site). Patients prioritized practical aspects such as clinic proximity and quality of clinician interaction. Most were unaware of the payor-segregated clinic system and disapproved upon learning about it. Opinions varied on topics of telehealth and continuity, indicating diverse patient needs. Notably, minoritized patients valued race and class concordance in clinical spaces. Patients generally supported care integration, conditional upon the preservation of aspects of care they valued.Successful OBGYN care integration requires meeting individual needs while ensuring diversity, safety, and community-oriented care, alongside access and convenience. Incorporating patient voices is crucial for aligning services with expectations and improving patient experiences. · Patients disapprove of payor-segregated care but prioritize practical aspects over care structure.. · Minoritized patients valued race/class concordance. Preferences varied on continuity, residents, and telehealth.. · Clear communication around prior payor segregation and motivations for integration will foster trust..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2505-5508
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Payor-Segregated Outpatient Obstetrics and Gynecology Care Models: The Patient Perspective

Allison Schachter, Rebecca Feldman Hamm, Sarita Sonalkar, Florencia Greer Polite et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Perinatology
Healthcare Policy and Management
1.13
article

Integrating Payor-Segregated Outpatient Obstetrics and Gynecology Care Models: The Patient Perspective

Allison Schachter, Rebecca Feldman Hamm, Sarita Sonalkar, Florencia Greer Polite, Elizabeth G. Clement, Kavita Vinekar, Marilyn M. Schapira, Karampreet Kaur, Arina Chesnokova, Abike James, Annie Apple
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Significant racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality as well as gynecologic outcomes persist in the United States. The role of ambulatory care in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), particularly in facilities that separate resident and attending care along payor (and de facto racial) lines, remains unclear. This study examines patient perspectives on payor-segregated health care delivery in an academic medical center (AMC) and opinions on possible integration.This is a qualitative study conducted at a single AMC with payor-segregated resident and attending outpatient sites. Interviews focused on patient perception of experience and value in outpatient OBGYN care, perspectives on the segregated care model, and attitudes about integration. Patients participated in a 30-minute semistructured interview with recruitment continuing until thematic saturation was reached (October 2022-August 2023). Interviews were coded using an integrated approach with grounded theory; 12% of transcripts were double-coded (<i>k</i> = 0.86).We interviewed 26 patients (16 from resident, 10 from attending site). Patients prioritized practical aspects such as clinic proximity and quality of clinician interaction. Most were unaware of the payor-segregated clinic system and disapproved upon learning about it. Opinions varied on topics of telehealth and continuity, indicating diverse patient needs. Notably, minoritized patients valued race and class concordance in clinical spaces. Patients generally supported care integration, conditional upon the preservation of aspects of care they valued.Successful OBGYN care integration requires meeting individual needs while ensuring diversity, safety, and community-oriented care, alongside access and convenience. Incorporating patient voices is crucial for aligning services with expectations and improving patient experiences. · Patients disapprove of payor-segregated care but prioritize practical aspects over care structure.. · Minoritized patients valued race/class concordance. Preferences varied on continuity, residents, and telehealth.. · Clear communication around prior payor segregation and motivations for integration will foster trust..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 42(11)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Philadelphia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Policy and Management
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.