Formation and Evolution Mechanism of High‐quality Reservoirs in the Lacustrine Hyperpycnal System: The 2nd Member of the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation, Qiudong Subsag, Turpan–Hami Basin, NW China

Abstract Hyperpycnal deposits has gradually emerged as a current research hotspot, with a special focus on lacustrine hyperpycnal deposits. However, our understanding of the formation mechanism and distribution of high‐quality reservoirs in hyperpycnal deposits remains insufficient. In this study, the formation mechanism and distribution of high‐quality reservoirs in the second member of the Sangonghe Formation are studied through sedimentology, petrology, and geochemistry, and 10 types of lithofacies were identified in the depositional sequences of the hyperpycnal flow. These can be summarized as gravelly bed to suspended load lithofacies association (GBS), gravelly reverse to normal compound‐graded (GNR), coarse‐grained sandy suspended load (CSS), and fine‐grained sandy suspended load (FSS) lithofacies associations. The hyperpycnal system can be divided into four individual units: restricted channel, unrestricted channel, lobe, and levee. The reservoir quality varies with lithofacies. Gravelly bed load lithofacies has coarse grain sizes, high content of rigid minerals, and soluble components, such as magmatic rock fragments. Therefore, the gravelly bed load lithofacies reservoir has developed dissolution pores and well‐preserved pore throats. Its reservoir quality is good. GBS and GNR are the main lithofacies associations in the restricted channel, where type I and type II reservoirs developed. The unrestricted channel is dominated by the CSS lithofacies association, with type III reservoirs developed. The lobe is dominated by the CSS and FSS lithofacies associations, with type III and type IV reservoirs developed. High‐quality reservoirs mainly develop in the restricted and unrestricted channels, whereas reservoirs in the lobe have poor quality. The levees are dominated by siltstone and gray mudstone and are generally nonreservoirs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.15257
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formation and Evolution Mechanism of High‐quality Reservoirs in the Lacustrine Hyperpycnal System: The 2nd Member of the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation, Qiudong Subsag, Turpan–Hami Basin, NW China

Wenjiao Yao, Yunfei Wu, Xueli JIA, Yizhuo YANG et al.
Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Formation and Evolution Mechanism of High‐quality Reservoirs in the Lacustrine Hyperpycnal System: The 2nd Member of the Lower Jurassic Sangonghe Formation, Qiudong Subsag, Turpan–Hami Basin, NW China

Wenjiao Yao, Yunfei Wu, Xueli JIA, Yizhuo YANG, Zhilong Huang, Yun Pan, Bo Wang, Junhui Wang, Zhiyuan Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hyperpycnal deposits has gradually emerged as a current research hotspot, with a special focus on lacustrine hyperpycnal deposits. However, our understanding of the formation mechanism and distribution of high‐quality reservoirs in hyperpycnal deposits remains insufficient. In this study, the formation mechanism and distribution of high‐quality reservoirs in the second member of the Sangonghe Formation are studied through sedimentology, petrology, and geochemistry, and 10 types of lithofacies were identified in the depositional sequences of the hyperpycnal flow. These can be summarized as gravelly bed to suspended load lithofacies association (GBS), gravelly reverse to normal compound‐graded (GNR), coarse‐grained sandy suspended load (CSS), and fine‐grained sandy suspended load (FSS) lithofacies associations. The hyperpycnal system can be divided into four individual units: restricted channel, unrestricted channel, lobe, and levee. The reservoir quality varies with lithofacies. Gravelly bed load lithofacies has coarse grain sizes, high content of rigid minerals, and soluble components, such as magmatic rock fragments. Therefore, the gravelly bed load lithofacies reservoir has developed dissolution pores and well‐preserved pore throats. Its reservoir quality is good. GBS and GNR are the main lithofacies associations in the restricted channel, where type I and type II reservoirs developed. The unrestricted channel is dominated by the CSS lithofacies association, with type III reservoirs developed. The lobe is dominated by the CSS and FSS lithofacies associations, with type III and type IV reservoirs developed. High‐quality reservoirs mainly develop in the restricted and unrestricted channels, whereas reservoirs in the lobe have poor quality. The levees are dominated by siltstone and gray mudstone and are generally nonreservoirs.

Acta Geologica Sinica - English EditionVol. 98(6)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.