Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between isolated and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery

Abstract Background Accurate reflections of long-term outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery are underreported in the literature. Most published cohort studies consisted of patients receiving tricuspid valve surgery concomitant with left-sided procedures. Patients who undergo isolated tricuspid valve surgery usually present late for surgery, with deteriorating risk factors leading to increased surgical risk. Thus, this study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery with those of tricuspid surgery concomitant with left-sided valve procedures. This retrospective cohort study included 617 patients who underwent isolated and left-sided concomitant tricuspid valve surgery from 2009 to 2020. We grouped the patients into isolated ( n = 63) vs. concomitant tricuspid surgery ( n = 554). Results Isolated tricuspid surgery was associated with significantly greater rates of operative mortality (19% vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001), renal failure requiring dialysis (12.7% vs. 2.71%, P < 0.001), and need for ventilation > 24 h (22.22% vs. 12.27%, P = 0.028). ICU (3 days vs. 2 days, P = 0.005) and hospital stays (13 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.042) were significantly longer in isolated tricuspid surgery patients. Isolated tricuspid surgery independently predicted hospital mortality ( OR : 4.00 (95% CI : 1.59–10.05), P = 0.003). The risk of follow-up mortality was higher in patients with isolated surgery ( HR : 1.95 (95% CI : 0.98–3.86); P = 0.055). However, isolated tricuspid surgery was not associated with heart failure rehospitalization ( HR : 1.11 (95% CI : 0.51–2.41); P = 0.798) or increased tricuspid valve reinterventions ( HR : 1.42 (95% CI : 0.51– 3.92); P = 0.499). Conclusions Isolated tricuspid surgery independently predicted hospital mortality and was associated with nonsignificantly higher long-term mortality. This finding highlights the importance of timely referral and intervention for patients with isolated tricuspid valve disease to optimize short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cardiothoracic Surgeon
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43057-024-00145-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between isolated and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery

Rawan Alghamdi, Monirah Abdulrahman Albabtain, Huda Ismail, Claudio Pragliola et al.
2 citations
The Cardiothoracic Surgeon
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.80
article

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between isolated and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery

Rawan Alghamdi, Monirah Abdulrahman Albabtain, Huda Ismail, Claudio Pragliola, Amr A. Arafat, Haneen Alghosoon, Adam I. Adam, Khaled Alotaibi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate reflections of long-term outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery are underreported in the literature. Most published cohort studies consisted of patients receiving tricuspid valve surgery concomitant with left-sided procedures. Patients who undergo isolated tricuspid valve surgery usually present late for surgery, with deteriorating risk factors leading to increased surgical risk. Thus, this study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery with those of tricuspid surgery concomitant with left-sided valve procedures. This retrospective cohort study included 617 patients who underwent isolated and left-sided concomitant tricuspid valve surgery from 2009 to 2020. We grouped the patients into isolated ( n = 63) vs. concomitant tricuspid surgery ( n = 554). Results Isolated tricuspid surgery was associated with significantly greater rates of operative mortality (19% vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001), renal failure requiring dialysis (12.7% vs. 2.71%, P < 0.001), and need for ventilation > 24 h (22.22% vs. 12.27%, P = 0.028). ICU (3 days vs. 2 days, P = 0.005) and hospital stays (13 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.042) were significantly longer in isolated tricuspid surgery patients. Isolated tricuspid surgery independently predicted hospital mortality ( OR : 4.00 (95% CI : 1.59–10.05), P = 0.003). The risk of follow-up mortality was higher in patients with isolated surgery ( HR : 1.95 (95% CI : 0.98–3.86); P = 0.055). However, isolated tricuspid surgery was not associated with heart failure rehospitalization ( HR : 1.11 (95% CI : 0.51–2.41); P = 0.798) or increased tricuspid valve reinterventions ( HR : 1.42 (95% CI : 0.51– 3.92); P = 0.499). Conclusions Isolated tricuspid surgery independently predicted hospital mortality and was associated with nonsignificantly higher long-term mortality. This finding highlights the importance of timely referral and intervention for patients with isolated tricuspid valve disease to optimize short- and long-term outcomes.

The Cardiothoracic SurgeonVol. 32(1)
Ministry of Defence (GB), Prince Sultan University (SA), Tanta University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.