Comparative analysis of wheel‒rail frictional temperature rise using moving heat source and thermo-mechanical coupling methods at various wheel‒rail creepages

A finite element (FE) model of wheel‒rail frictional heating with moving heat source is proposed in this paper for estimating the wheel‒rail contact temperature distributions under repeated long-term operation. To calculate the temperature rise in wheel‒rail friction, this study compares the computational accuracy and efficiency of the temperature field generated by the moving heat source method and the thermo-mechanical coupling method. A three-dimensional transient wheel‒rail rolling contact thermo-mechanical coupling finite element model is established using ANSYS/LSDYNA software. The moving heat source method is conducted through ANSYS transient thermal analysis with a time step of 2.57 × 10 −5 s, meeting the thermal analysis requirements. Taking into account the influence of complex operating conditions and the third medium between the wheel and rail, this study compares and analyzes the two methods under different wheel–rail creepage conditions. The following conclusions were drawn: as creepages increase, the wheel tread surface temperature increases approximately linearly, with the temperature calculated by the moving heat source method being larger. The temperature difference between the two methods gradually increases, and the maximum temperature value difference is 4.9%, which is less than 5%. The moving heat source approach can save approximately 20 times the computational time. Considering both calculation time and efficiency, the moving heat source method can be employed as an alternative to the three-dimensional transient wheel‒rail rolling contact thermo-mechanical coupling finite element method. This study provides theoretical support and a finite element model reference for the calculation of wheel‒rail friction temperature rise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097241309501
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of wheel‒rail frictional temperature rise using moving heat source and thermo-mechanical coupling methods at various wheel‒rail creepages

Zefeng Wen, Gongquan Tao, Jinyu Zhang
4 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.85
article

Comparative analysis of wheel‒rail frictional temperature rise using moving heat source and thermo-mechanical coupling methods at various wheel‒rail creepages

Zefeng Wen, Gongquan Tao, Jinyu Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A finite element (FE) model of wheel‒rail frictional heating with moving heat source is proposed in this paper for estimating the wheel‒rail contact temperature distributions under repeated long-term operation. To calculate the temperature rise in wheel‒rail friction, this study compares the computational accuracy and efficiency of the temperature field generated by the moving heat source method and the thermo-mechanical coupling method. A three-dimensional transient wheel‒rail rolling contact thermo-mechanical coupling finite element model is established using ANSYS/LSDYNA software. The moving heat source method is conducted through ANSYS transient thermal analysis with a time step of 2.57 × 10 −5 s, meeting the thermal analysis requirements. Taking into account the influence of complex operating conditions and the third medium between the wheel and rail, this study compares and analyzes the two methods under different wheel–rail creepage conditions. The following conclusions were drawn: as creepages increase, the wheel tread surface temperature increases approximately linearly, with the temperature calculated by the moving heat source method being larger. The temperature difference between the two methods gradually increases, and the maximum temperature value difference is 4.9%, which is less than 5%. The moving heat source approach can save approximately 20 times the computational time. Considering both calculation time and efficiency, the moving heat source method can be employed as an alternative to the three-dimensional transient wheel‒rail rolling contact thermo-mechanical coupling finite element method. This study provides theoretical support and a finite element model reference for the calculation of wheel‒rail friction temperature rise.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid TransitVol. 239(3)
Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.