Robustness of Urban Rail Transit Networks Considering Cascade Failure under Attacks: A Case Study of Nanjing, China

Urban rail transit (URT) has become one of the main carriers to undertake passenger transportation tasks in large and medium-sized cities. However, station failures can reduce the efficiency of passenger travel and the transport capacity of the entire network. This paper constructs an urban rail transit network (URTN) topology model based on complex network theory and builds a cascade failure model considering load redistribution, five attack strategies, and three load distribution strategies. Then, the transport capacity is taken as a comprehensive metric of network robustness and the effects of different attack strategies, different load distribution strategies, and different parameter values on the robustness of URTN are compared. Finally, the Nanjing rail transit network is used as the case study. The Intentional Attack (IA) strategy is more destructive to the transport capacity than the Random Attack strategy. The network robustness under the Static Intentional Attack (SIA) strategy is weaker than that of the Dynamic Intentional Attack (DIA) strategy. Given different load distribution strategies, the levels of network damage based on the station degree and the betweenness of the attack strategy are different. The residual capacity load distribution strategy can significantly improve the robustness of the network. The robustness of the network can be improved by adjusting the coefficient of the capacity regulation and passenger transfer rate and can be optimized when the coefficient of capacity regulation is in the interval of [0.6, 0.8] and the passenger transfer rate is in the interval of [0.3, 0.4]. The proposed methods can be applied to assess the robustness of an URTN and offer operators an alternative to formulate safety operational management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.rueng-1324
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robustness of Urban Rail Transit Networks Considering Cascade Failure under Attacks: A Case Study of Nanjing, China

Steven Chien, Jie Liu, Dawei Hu, Ke Wu et al.
3 citations
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.78
article

Robustness of Urban Rail Transit Networks Considering Cascade Failure under Attacks: A Case Study of Nanjing, China

Steven Chien, Jie Liu, Dawei Hu, Ke Wu, Zhuanglin Ma, Yue Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Urban rail transit (URT) has become one of the main carriers to undertake passenger transportation tasks in large and medium-sized cities. However, station failures can reduce the efficiency of passenger travel and the transport capacity of the entire network. This paper constructs an urban rail transit network (URTN) topology model based on complex network theory and builds a cascade failure model considering load redistribution, five attack strategies, and three load distribution strategies. Then, the transport capacity is taken as a comprehensive metric of network robustness and the effects of different attack strategies, different load distribution strategies, and different parameter values on the robustness of URTN are compared. Finally, the Nanjing rail transit network is used as the case study. The Intentional Attack (IA) strategy is more destructive to the transport capacity than the Random Attack strategy. The network robustness under the Static Intentional Attack (SIA) strategy is weaker than that of the Dynamic Intentional Attack (DIA) strategy. Given different load distribution strategies, the levels of network damage based on the station degree and the betweenness of the attack strategy are different. The residual capacity load distribution strategy can significantly improve the robustness of the network. The robustness of the network can be improved by adjusting the coefficient of the capacity regulation and passenger transfer rate and can be optimized when the coefficient of capacity regulation is in the interval of [0.6, 0.8] and the passenger transfer rate is in the interval of [0.3, 0.4]. The proposed methods can be applied to assess the robustness of an URTN and offer operators an alternative to formulate safety operational management strategies.

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil EngineeringVol. 11(1)
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US), China Academy of Transportation Sciences (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.