Effects of a six-day, whole-diet sweet taste intervention on pleasantness, desire for and intakes of sweet foods: a randomised controlled trial

Reduced exposure to sweet taste has been proposed to reduce sweet food preferences and intakes, but the evidence to support these associations is limited. This randomised controlled trial investigated the effects of a whole-diet sweet taste intervention for 6 d, on subsequent pleasantness, desire for and sweet food intakes. Participants (<i>n</i> 104) were randomised to increase (<i>n</i> 40), decrease (<i>n</i> 43) or make no change to (<i>n</i> 21) their consumption of sweet-tasting foods and beverages for 6 consecutive days. Pleasantness, desire to eat, sweet taste intensity and sweet food and beverage intakes were assessed on days 0 and 7. One hundred and two (98 %) participants completed the study, and self-reported adherence with the dietary interventions was moderate to good (M = 66-72/100 mm), with instructions to decrease sweet food consumption reported as more difficult than the other diets (smallest (<i>t</i>(81) = 2·45, <i>P</i> = 0·02, <i>M</i> <sub><i>diff</i></sub> = 14/100 mm, se = 2 mm). In intention-to-treat analyses, participants in the decreased sweet food consumption group reported higher sweet taste intensity perceptions at day 7 compared with day 0 (<i>F</i>(2101) = 4·10, <i>P</i> = 0·02, <i>M</i> <sub><i>diff</i></sub> = 6/100 mm, se = 2 mm). No effects were found for pleasantness (<i>F</i>(2101) = 2·04, <i>P</i> = 0·14), desire to eat (<i>F</i>(2101) = 1·49, <i>P</i> = 0·23) or any of the measures of sweet food intake (largest <i>F</i>(2101) = 2·53, <i>P</i> = 0·09). These results were confirmed in regression analyses that took self-reported adherence to the diets into account. Our findings suggest that exposure to sweet taste does not affect pleasantness, desire for or intakes of sweet-tasting foods and beverages. Public health recommendations to limit the consumption of sweet-tasting foods and beverages to reduce sweet food preferences may require revision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114524003209
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of a six-day, whole-diet sweet taste intervention on pleasantness, desire for and intakes of sweet foods: a randomised controlled trial

Peter J. Rogers, Katherine Marie Appleton, Aleksandra D Bielat
4 citations
British Journal Of Nutrition
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
1.24
article

Effects of a six-day, whole-diet sweet taste intervention on pleasantness, desire for and intakes of sweet foods: a randomised controlled trial

Peter J. Rogers, Katherine Marie Appleton, Aleksandra D Bielat
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Reduced exposure to sweet taste has been proposed to reduce sweet food preferences and intakes, but the evidence to support these associations is limited. This randomised controlled trial investigated the effects of a whole-diet sweet taste intervention for 6 d, on subsequent pleasantness, desire for and sweet food intakes. Participants (<i>n</i> 104) were randomised to increase (<i>n</i> 40), decrease (<i>n</i> 43) or make no change to (<i>n</i> 21) their consumption of sweet-tasting foods and beverages for 6 consecutive days. Pleasantness, desire to eat, sweet taste intensity and sweet food and beverage intakes were assessed on days 0 and 7. One hundred and two (98 %) participants completed the study, and self-reported adherence with the dietary interventions was moderate to good (M = 66-72/100 mm), with instructions to decrease sweet food consumption reported as more difficult than the other diets (smallest (<i>t</i>(81) = 2·45, <i>P</i> = 0·02, <i>M</i> <sub><i>diff</i></sub> = 14/100 mm, se = 2 mm). In intention-to-treat analyses, participants in the decreased sweet food consumption group reported higher sweet taste intensity perceptions at day 7 compared with day 0 (<i>F</i>(2101) = 4·10, <i>P</i> = 0·02, <i>M</i> <sub><i>diff</i></sub> = 6/100 mm, se = 2 mm). No effects were found for pleasantness (<i>F</i>(2101) = 2·04, <i>P</i> = 0·14), desire to eat (<i>F</i>(2101) = 1·49, <i>P</i> = 0·23) or any of the measures of sweet food intake (largest <i>F</i>(2101) = 2·53, <i>P</i> = 0·09). These results were confirmed in regression analyses that took self-reported adherence to the diets into account. Our findings suggest that exposure to sweet taste does not affect pleasantness, desire for or intakes of sweet-tasting foods and beverages. Public health recommendations to limit the consumption of sweet-tasting foods and beverages to reduce sweet food preferences may require revision.

British Journal Of NutritionVol. 133(2)
University of Bristol (GB), Bournemouth University (GB)
PepsiCo, Coca-Cola Foundation, Bournemouth University, American Beverage Association, University of Bristol, International Sweeteners Association
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.