‘The Most Important Weapon in this Diplomatic Warfor National Union’: The Irish Free State and theBoundary Commission, 1923–25

This article questions the prevailing historiographical view that the approach of the Irish Free State to the Boundary Commission was lax and passive. It argues that the Free State adopted a strategic and tactical approach, not as a technicality to fulfil their Anglo-Irish Treaty obligations, but out of a genuine desire for national union. The North-Eastern Boundary Bureau distributed publicity demonstrating the wishes of the inhabitants and outlined international comparisons. Officials visited Northern Ireland and Britain to ascertawin the views of stake-holders. The suggestions for creating all-Ireland institutions as an alternative to the commission show that the Free State leaders were motivated by a desire for ‘national union’. The dissemination of publicity internationally, the bureau’s role in applying for League of Nations membership, and the registration of the treaty at Geneva challenged potential British claims that the boundary was a domestic matter and demonstrates consideration of a potential appeal to the league.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.0.a948892
Primary Topic
Irish and British Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘The Most Important Weapon in this Diplomatic Warfor National Union’: The Irish Free State and theBoundary Commission, 1923–25

Patrick Duffy
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Irish and British Studies
article

‘The Most Important Weapon in this Diplomatic Warfor National Union’: The Irish Free State and theBoundary Commission, 1923–25

Patrick Duffy
article en

Abstract

This article questions the prevailing historiographical view that the approach of the Irish Free State to the Boundary Commission was lax and passive. It argues that the Free State adopted a strategic and tactical approach, not as a technicality to fulfil their Anglo-Irish Treaty obligations, but out of a genuine desire for national union. The North-Eastern Boundary Bureau distributed publicity demonstrating the wishes of the inhabitants and outlined international comparisons. Officials visited Northern Ireland and Britain to ascertawin the views of stake-holders. The suggestions for creating all-Ireland institutions as an alternative to the commission show that the Free State leaders were motivated by a desire for ‘national union’. The dissemination of publicity internationally, the bureau’s role in applying for League of Nations membership, and the registration of the treaty at Geneva challenged potential British claims that the boundary was a domestic matter and demonstrates consideration of a potential appeal to the league.

Irish Studies in International Affairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Irish and British Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.