Evaluation Of Retention Using Light Polymerizing Tray Resin, Heavy Viscosity Addition Silicone and Low Fusing Impression Compound as Border Molding Material: A Clinical Comparative Study

The purpose of this in vivo study is to compare and evaluate retention using light polymerizing tray resin, heavy viscosity addition silicone and low fusing impression compound as border moulding material. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY:Eighteen patients with completely edentulous maxillary arch were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Primary impression was made, followed by border moulding using the Low fusing impression compound (GROUP A), Heavy viscosity addition silicone (GROUP B), Light polymerizing tray material (GROUP C).Final impression was made and master casts were poured.Heat cure denture bases were fabricated and the retention values measured using the Dynamometer.Retention force values obtained for all the three groups were analyzed by One way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple posthoc tests. RESULTS:Mean and standard deviation retention force values for Low fusing impression compound is 5.81+-1.10kgf, 5.59+-1.11kgffor Heavy viscosity addition silicone , 5.97+-1.15kgffor Light polymerizing tray material.There is no statistically significant difference between the three groups and their mean retention values for all the three groups is 5.79+-1.11kgf. CONCLUSION:The retention values of the single step border moulding materials were at par with, if not better than those of the conventional border moulding approach.This investigation found that light polymerizing tray material and heavy viscosity Evaluation Of Retention Using Light Polymerizing Tray Resin, Heavy Viscosity Addition Silicone and Low Fusing Impression Compound as Border Molding Material:

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i4s.5104
Primary Topic
Intramuscular injections and effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Of Retention Using Light Polymerizing Tray Resin, Heavy Viscosity Addition Silicone and Low Fusing Impression Compound as Border Molding Material: A Clinical Comparative Study

Satish K. Pardeshi
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Intramuscular injections and effects
article

Evaluation Of Retention Using Light Polymerizing Tray Resin, Heavy Viscosity Addition Silicone and Low Fusing Impression Compound as Border Molding Material: A Clinical Comparative Study

Satish K. Pardeshi
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this in vivo study is to compare and evaluate retention using light polymerizing tray resin, heavy viscosity addition silicone and low fusing impression compound as border moulding material. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY:Eighteen patients with completely edentulous maxillary arch were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Primary impression was made, followed by border moulding using the Low fusing impression compound (GROUP A), Heavy viscosity addition silicone (GROUP B), Light polymerizing tray material (GROUP C).Final impression was made and master casts were poured.Heat cure denture bases were fabricated and the retention values measured using the Dynamometer.Retention force values obtained for all the three groups were analyzed by One way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple posthoc tests. RESULTS:Mean and standard deviation retention force values for Low fusing impression compound is 5.81+-1.10kgf, 5.59+-1.11kgffor Heavy viscosity addition silicone , 5.97+-1.15kgffor Light polymerizing tray material.There is no statistically significant difference between the three groups and their mean retention values for all the three groups is 5.79+-1.11kgf. CONCLUSION:The retention values of the single step border moulding materials were at par with, if not better than those of the conventional border moulding approach.This investigation found that light polymerizing tray material and heavy viscosity Evaluation Of Retention Using Light Polymerizing Tray Resin, Heavy Viscosity Addition Silicone and Low Fusing Impression Compound as Border Molding Material:

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Intramuscular injections and effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.