Challenging Impunity: Colombia and Nicaragua's Intervention in the Israeli Genocide Case at the ICJ

In 2023, Colombia and Nicaragua intervened in cases where Israel was accused of genocide. These interventions challenge the principle of impunity often enjoyed by powerful states. Colombia and Nicaragua have taken a stand against perceived injustices and sought to influence the course of the international legal process. This research used normative research methods, namely international law literature, legal documents, and previous ICJ decisions. This article analyzed the legal basis of the intervention and its impact on international law enforcement efforts related to genocide. This analysis is expected to contribute to the ongoing discussion in international law, particularly regarding state responsibility for the crime of genocide. This case challenges the practice of impunity in international law, particularly in relation to state actions deemed to violate human rights on a mass scale. This research also contributes to our understanding of the role of the ICJ in dealing with allegations of genocide, as well as the importance of small and medium-sized state interventions in fighting for international justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no4.3593
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging Impunity: Colombia and Nicaragua's Intervention in the Israeli Genocide Case at the ICJ

Yordan Gunawan, Elfa Rheanna Prameswari, Himmaturrahmah Himmaturrahmah
Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Challenging Impunity: Colombia and Nicaragua's Intervention in the Israeli Genocide Case at the ICJ

Yordan Gunawan, Elfa Rheanna Prameswari, Himmaturrahmah Himmaturrahmah
article en

Abstract

In 2023, Colombia and Nicaragua intervened in cases where Israel was accused of genocide. These interventions challenge the principle of impunity often enjoyed by powerful states. Colombia and Nicaragua have taken a stand against perceived injustices and sought to influence the course of the international legal process. This research used normative research methods, namely international law literature, legal documents, and previous ICJ decisions. This article analyzed the legal basis of the intervention and its impact on international law enforcement efforts related to genocide. This analysis is expected to contribute to the ongoing discussion in international law, particularly regarding state responsibility for the crime of genocide. This case challenges the practice of impunity in international law, particularly in relation to state actions deemed to violate human rights on a mass scale. This research also contributes to our understanding of the role of the ICJ in dealing with allegations of genocide, as well as the importance of small and medium-sized state interventions in fighting for international justice.

Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu HukumVol. 18(4)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenging Impunity: Colombia and Nicaragua's Intervention in the Israeli Genocide Case at the ICJ — Yordan Gunawan, Elfa Rheanna Prameswari, et al. · Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS