Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-BR53 onto the preference-based EQ-5D-5L instrument: A cross-sectional study in breast cancer in Vietnam

Introduction: The EQ-5D instrument is highly recommended for health economic evaluations but is considered less practical than the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC) QLQ-BR53 in clinical studies with cancer patients. In these cases, cross-walking is recommended to convert the cancer-specific instrument onto the preference-based measures. This study aimed to develop an algorithm for direct mapping the QLQ-BR53 onto the EQ-5D-5L utility index in breast cancer patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients diagnosed with HER2 breast cancer across six oncology hospitals in Vietnam from July to December 2020. Participants' health-related quality of life was assessed using QLQ-BR53 and EQ-5D. Two mapping algorithms - ordinary least squares (OLS) and generalized linear regression (GLM) - were compared. The best-fit model was selected based on MAE, RMSE, MAPE, and AIC. Internal validation was done using hold-out and cross-validation methods. Results: The study involved 338 participants with a mean age of 53.87 ± 9.97 years. Most were diagnosed early (55.7%) and non-metastatic (76.6%). The mean EQ-5D utility value was 0.863 ± 0.142. The OLS model was the best fit for mapping EQ-5D utility scores from QLQ-BR53, with goodness-of-fit statistics: MAE = 0.786; RMSE = 0.1038; MAPE = 11.68%; and AIC = -524.2398. Key components included global health status, future perspective, pain, and arm symptoms. Conclusion: The developed model allows mapping QLQ-BR53 breast cancer data to EQ-5D-5L utility values, aiding in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analyses in breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC TẾ HỒNG BÀNG
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59294/hiujs.vol.7.2024.687
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-BR53 onto the preference-based EQ-5D-5L instrument: A cross-sectional study in breast cancer in Vietnam

Taeyang Ha, Pham Thi Cam Phuong, Lê Tuấn Anh, Nguyễn Thị Thu Thủy et al.
1 links
TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC TẾ HỒNG BÀNG
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-BR53 onto the preference-based EQ-5D-5L instrument: A cross-sectional study in breast cancer in Vietnam

Taeyang Ha, Pham Thi Cam Phuong, Lê Tuấn Anh, Nguyễn Thị Thu Thủy, To Hue Nghi, Vo Ngoc Yen Nhi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The EQ-5D instrument is highly recommended for health economic evaluations but is considered less practical than the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC) QLQ-BR53 in clinical studies with cancer patients. In these cases, cross-walking is recommended to convert the cancer-specific instrument onto the preference-based measures. This study aimed to develop an algorithm for direct mapping the QLQ-BR53 onto the EQ-5D-5L utility index in breast cancer patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients diagnosed with HER2 breast cancer across six oncology hospitals in Vietnam from July to December 2020. Participants' health-related quality of life was assessed using QLQ-BR53 and EQ-5D. Two mapping algorithms - ordinary least squares (OLS) and generalized linear regression (GLM) - were compared. The best-fit model was selected based on MAE, RMSE, MAPE, and AIC. Internal validation was done using hold-out and cross-validation methods. Results: The study involved 338 participants with a mean age of 53.87 ± 9.97 years. Most were diagnosed early (55.7%) and non-metastatic (76.6%). The mean EQ-5D utility value was 0.863 ± 0.142. The OLS model was the best fit for mapping EQ-5D utility scores from QLQ-BR53, with goodness-of-fit statistics: MAE = 0.786; RMSE = 0.1038; MAPE = 11.68%; and AIC = -524.2398. Key components included global health status, future perspective, pain, and arm symptoms. Conclusion: The developed model allows mapping QLQ-BR53 breast cancer data to EQ-5D-5L utility values, aiding in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analyses in breast cancer.

TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC TẾ HỒNG BÀNG
Cho Ray Hospital (VN), Institute of Technology Assessment (AT), HCMC Hospital of Dermato Venereology (VN), Hong Bang International University (VN), Bạch Mai Hospital (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.