Current nonculture-based diagnosis of candidemia

Candidemia is the most common healthcare-associated invasive fungal infection with high crude mortality rates. It primarily affects critically ill or severely immunocompromised patients, complicating early diagnosis and prompting the initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy. The gold standard for diagnosing candidemia is blood culture; however, the sensitivity of this test is low and requires at least two days for species identification. These limitations have led to the development of alternative diagnostic methods that are more sensitive and have shorter turnaround times. Here, we review the currently available methods for the nonculturebased diagnosis of candidemia, including (i) immunological diagnostics targeting Candida-related antigens, (ii) human antibodies to Candida-related antigens, and (iii) molecular diagnostics. The strengths, uses, and limitations of each methodology are discussed. Immunological diagnostics targeting Candida-related antigens and human antibodies to these antigens provide supportive evidence for diagnosing candidemia. Advances in molecular diagnostics have shown promising results in facilitating early candidemia diagnosis, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5145/acm.2024.27.4.4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hormonal and reproductive studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current nonculture-based diagnosis of candidemia

Eun Jeong Won
1 citations
Annals of Clinical Microbiology
Hormonal and reproductive studies
0.36
article

Current nonculture-based diagnosis of candidemia

Eun Jeong Won
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Candidemia is the most common healthcare-associated invasive fungal infection with high crude mortality rates. It primarily affects critically ill or severely immunocompromised patients, complicating early diagnosis and prompting the initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy. The gold standard for diagnosing candidemia is blood culture; however, the sensitivity of this test is low and requires at least two days for species identification. These limitations have led to the development of alternative diagnostic methods that are more sensitive and have shorter turnaround times. Here, we review the currently available methods for the nonculturebased diagnosis of candidemia, including (i) immunological diagnostics targeting Candida-related antigens, (ii) human antibodies to Candida-related antigens, and (iii) molecular diagnostics. The strengths, uses, and limitations of each methodology are discussed. Immunological diagnostics targeting Candida-related antigens and human antibodies to these antigens provide supportive evidence for diagnosing candidemia. Advances in molecular diagnostics have shown promising results in facilitating early candidemia diagnosis, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Annals of Clinical MicrobiologyVol. 27(4)
University of Ulsan (KR)
National Research Foundation, Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Hormonal and reproductive studies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Current nonculture-based diagnosis of candidemia — Eun Jeong Won · Annals of Clinical Microbiology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS