How Do Governance Conditions Influence Knowledge Diaspora Engagement in the Development Agenda of Ethiopia?

Abstract Generating evidence of knowledge diaspora engagement governance conditions is crucial for informed decision-making, yet there is a lack of research of this topic in the Ethiopian context. This study aimed to investigate how governance conditions influence knowledge diaspora engagement in Ethiopia’s development agenda. Qualitative methods, including key informant interviews and focus group discussions with purposely selected stakeholders (such as ministries, diaspora coordinating offices, universities, teaching and referral hospitals and diaspora associations), were employed to generate and analyse the evidence. The study found that, despite the political will, a formal diaspora policy, diaspora coordinating offices and the diaspora’s cultural attachment to their country of origin, actual engagement remains limited. The reasons for this include political instability, incoherent policies, weak collaboration among agencies, lack of engagement strategies, corruption, unnecessarily restrictive bureaucratic service delivery and inadequate monitoring mechanisms. Addressing gaps in the governance conditions would improve the diaspora engagement, thereby enabling Ethiopia to harness the full potential of its knowledge diaspora for national development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diaspora Studies
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/09763457-bja10131
Primary Topic
African history and culture analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Governance Conditions Influence Knowledge Diaspora Engagement in the Development Agenda of Ethiopia?

Mekonnen Bogale, Sebsib Hadis, Nega Jibat, Abate Yesigat et al.
Diaspora Studies
African history and culture analysis
article

How Do Governance Conditions Influence Knowledge Diaspora Engagement in the Development Agenda of Ethiopia?

Mekonnen Bogale, Sebsib Hadis, Nega Jibat, Abate Yesigat, Tibebu Tafese
article en

Abstract

Abstract Generating evidence of knowledge diaspora engagement governance conditions is crucial for informed decision-making, yet there is a lack of research of this topic in the Ethiopian context. This study aimed to investigate how governance conditions influence knowledge diaspora engagement in Ethiopia’s development agenda. Qualitative methods, including key informant interviews and focus group discussions with purposely selected stakeholders (such as ministries, diaspora coordinating offices, universities, teaching and referral hospitals and diaspora associations), were employed to generate and analyse the evidence. The study found that, despite the political will, a formal diaspora policy, diaspora coordinating offices and the diaspora’s cultural attachment to their country of origin, actual engagement remains limited. The reasons for this include political instability, incoherent policies, weak collaboration among agencies, lack of engagement strategies, corruption, unnecessarily restrictive bureaucratic service delivery and inadequate monitoring mechanisms. Addressing gaps in the governance conditions would improve the diaspora engagement, thereby enabling Ethiopia to harness the full potential of its knowledge diaspora for national development.

Diaspora StudiesVol. 18(2)
Jimma University (ET), Hawassa University (ET), Government of Ethiopia (ET), Wollo University (ET)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
African history and culture analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.