A call to represent the current diversity of family forms in attachment research

As family forms become increasingly diverse, their underrepresentation in attachment research is glaring. Although attachment theory aims to explain the influence of early relationships, studies have disproportionately focused on mothers. Even when other attachment figures are considered, the research is typically limited to fathers in biparental mother-father families. In this piece, we report on the wide variety of family configurations worldwide, and how children experience care from multiple attachment figures. Drawing from the <i>Child Attachment Studies Catalogue and Data Exchange</i> (CASCADE), we assess the current state of attachment research with regard to diverse family configurations. Out of the available records in CASCADE, only four of 2,320 studies (0.2% of available studies) involved samples of diverse families. We conclude by issuing an explicit call for research that acknowledges and explores diverse family forms and propose strategies to improve reporting and research practices to promote more inclusivity of diverse family forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2024.2441990
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A call to represent the current diversity of family forms in attachment research

Nicola Carone, Audrey‐Ann Deneault, Sheri L. Madigan
8 citations
Attachment & Human Development
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
5.15
article

A call to represent the current diversity of family forms in attachment research

Nicola Carone, Audrey‐Ann Deneault, Sheri L. Madigan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

As family forms become increasingly diverse, their underrepresentation in attachment research is glaring. Although attachment theory aims to explain the influence of early relationships, studies have disproportionately focused on mothers. Even when other attachment figures are considered, the research is typically limited to fathers in biparental mother-father families. In this piece, we report on the wide variety of family configurations worldwide, and how children experience care from multiple attachment figures. Drawing from the <i>Child Attachment Studies Catalogue and Data Exchange</i> (CASCADE), we assess the current state of attachment research with regard to diverse family configurations. Out of the available records in CASCADE, only four of 2,320 studies (0.2% of available studies) involved samples of diverse families. We conclude by issuing an explicit call for research that acknowledges and explores diverse family forms and propose strategies to improve reporting and research practices to promote more inclusivity of diverse family forms.

Attachment & Human Development
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Calgary (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A call to represent the current diversity of family forms in attachment research — Nicola Carone, Audrey‐Ann Deneault, et al. · Attachment & Human Development (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS