Doctoral students' well‐being through the lens of social practice theory: An auto‐photography study

Abstract The aim of this study is to explore doctoral students' (DS) perceptions of social practices that contribute to their well‐being. Utilising social practice theory, specifically the framework of social practices as an interplay of ‘materials’, ‘meanings’ and ‘competences’, we examine which social practices enhance DS well‐being and the contexts in which these practices occur. We employ an auto‐photography methodology. Twelve UK‐based DS took photographs of places that relate to their well‐being and participated in interviews to explain their photos. On completing a three‐stage data analytic procedure, our findings show that DS well‐being is shaped by social practices shared between students and supervisors, where informal settings and the significance of place play a crucial role. We demonstrate that such settings, both on and off campus, act as facilitators for the performance of well‐being‐enhancing practices. Instead of solely attributing DS well‐being to micro‐level individual choices or macro‐level institutional factors, as is often conceptualised, we propose that scholars must focus on the dynamic interplay of social practices that shape DS well‐being. By demonstrating how social practices connect micro‐level experiences with macro‐level structures, we provide a deeper understanding of what shapes well‐being and highlight the essential role of place. Understanding these practices can inform targeted interventions and policies, ultimately enhancing well‐being among doctoral students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4086
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doctoral students' well‐being through the lens of social practice theory: An auto‐photography study

Janet McCray, Paul Joseph‐Richard
British Educational Research Journal
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Doctoral students' well‐being through the lens of social practice theory: An auto‐photography study

Janet McCray, Paul Joseph‐Richard
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study is to explore doctoral students' (DS) perceptions of social practices that contribute to their well‐being. Utilising social practice theory, specifically the framework of social practices as an interplay of ‘materials’, ‘meanings’ and ‘competences’, we examine which social practices enhance DS well‐being and the contexts in which these practices occur. We employ an auto‐photography methodology. Twelve UK‐based DS took photographs of places that relate to their well‐being and participated in interviews to explain their photos. On completing a three‐stage data analytic procedure, our findings show that DS well‐being is shaped by social practices shared between students and supervisors, where informal settings and the significance of place play a crucial role. We demonstrate that such settings, both on and off campus, act as facilitators for the performance of well‐being‐enhancing practices. Instead of solely attributing DS well‐being to micro‐level individual choices or macro‐level institutional factors, as is often conceptualised, we propose that scholars must focus on the dynamic interplay of social practices that shape DS well‐being. By demonstrating how social practices connect micro‐level experiences with macro‐level structures, we provide a deeper understanding of what shapes well‐being and highlight the essential role of place. Understanding these practices can inform targeted interventions and policies, ultimately enhancing well‐being among doctoral students.

British Educational Research JournalVol. 51(2)
University of Chichester (GB), University of Ulster (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.