Die deutsche Mandatarhaftung: Probleme und Perspektiven aus einem historisch-systematischen Standpunkt

Abstract The liability of the mandatary in German law: problems and perspectives from a historical and systematic point of view. According to the German Civil Code, the mandate contract must be gratuitous. Due to this characteristic, the standard of care is not limited in any way. This article analyses the proposals for potential limitations of the standard of care in German doctrine and case law for situations where full liability is not considered equitable. The systematic position of § 662 BGB and the historical context of its enactment are then examined focusing on the influence of the pandectist scholarship. Finally, the results of most recent Roman law scholarship on the mandate contract and on criteria for the mandatary’s liability are proposed as a useful comparative model for the modern interpreter.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Rivista di diritto romano
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7358/rdr-2024-ver
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Die deutsche Mandatarhaftung: Probleme und Perspektiven aus einem historisch-systematischen Standpunkt

Francesco Verrico
Rivista di diritto romano
European and International Contract Law
article

Die deutsche Mandatarhaftung: Probleme und Perspektiven aus einem historisch-systematischen Standpunkt

Francesco Verrico
article en

Abstract

Abstract The liability of the mandatary in German law: problems and perspectives from a historical and systematic point of view. According to the German Civil Code, the mandate contract must be gratuitous. Due to this characteristic, the standard of care is not limited in any way. This article analyses the proposals for potential limitations of the standard of care in German doctrine and case law for situations where full liability is not considered equitable. The systematic position of § 662 BGB and the historical context of its enactment are then examined focusing on the influence of the pandectist scholarship. Finally, the results of most recent Roman law scholarship on the mandate contract and on criteria for the mandatary’s liability are proposed as a useful comparative model for the modern interpreter.

Rivista di diritto romanoVol. 24
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.