Evaluation of framework for determining valuers preparedness for intellectual property valuation practice: perspectives from Lagos property market, Nigeria

Purpose As part of steps toward providing valuation clients with requisite information on the preparedness of practitioners for intellectual property (IP) valuation, this study developed and evaluated a framework for determining the preparedness of practitioners for IP valuation. Design/methodology/approach The developed framework built on ideas from past related studies and was evaluated by estate surveyors and valuers (ESVs) in Lagos property market, Nigeria. Through online survey, 125 ESVs participated in evaluating the framework. The professionals evaluated the significance, to preparedness, of 32 variables components of 5 main preparedness framework’s indicators. The variables were rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5 with 1 representing Not at all important and 5, Highly important. The data obtained were transposed into preparedness scales and relative important index (RII) using mean rating. Findings The result showed that four of the five main indicators in the developed framework were judged to be important in the measurement of practitioners’ preparedness for IP valuation. These are sensitisation and awareness of practitioners about IP valuation, training and education at tertiary institutions level, acquisition of informational materials and further professionals training. The fifth indicator (the presence of regulatory and clients’ support) was considered only moderately important. The study concluded that the developed framework, when applied, should be sufficient to establish practitioners’ (ESVs) level of preparedness for IP valuation in the study area and similar markets elsewhere. Practical implications The study has implication for the education and training of IP valuation practitioners. It will also serve as impetus for further study in the area of IP valuation, particularly with respect to measuring valuers’ preparedness, in the developing countries. Originality/value This study presents one of the few attempts at developing a framework for determining preparedness of practitioners for IP valuation in developing countries; a step which is expected to stimulate further actions towards full IP valuation practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Property Management
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/pm-06-2024-0059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of framework for determining valuers preparedness for intellectual property valuation practice: perspectives from Lagos property market, Nigeria

Theophilus Olugbenga Babatunde, Abel Olaleye, Immaculata Anthony Ekpo
1 citations
Property Management
Private Equity and Venture Capital
0.95
article

Evaluation of framework for determining valuers preparedness for intellectual property valuation practice: perspectives from Lagos property market, Nigeria

Theophilus Olugbenga Babatunde, Abel Olaleye, Immaculata Anthony Ekpo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose As part of steps toward providing valuation clients with requisite information on the preparedness of practitioners for intellectual property (IP) valuation, this study developed and evaluated a framework for determining the preparedness of practitioners for IP valuation. Design/methodology/approach The developed framework built on ideas from past related studies and was evaluated by estate surveyors and valuers (ESVs) in Lagos property market, Nigeria. Through online survey, 125 ESVs participated in evaluating the framework. The professionals evaluated the significance, to preparedness, of 32 variables components of 5 main preparedness framework’s indicators. The variables were rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5 with 1 representing Not at all important and 5, Highly important. The data obtained were transposed into preparedness scales and relative important index (RII) using mean rating. Findings The result showed that four of the five main indicators in the developed framework were judged to be important in the measurement of practitioners’ preparedness for IP valuation. These are sensitisation and awareness of practitioners about IP valuation, training and education at tertiary institutions level, acquisition of informational materials and further professionals training. The fifth indicator (the presence of regulatory and clients’ support) was considered only moderately important. The study concluded that the developed framework, when applied, should be sufficient to establish practitioners’ (ESVs) level of preparedness for IP valuation in the study area and similar markets elsewhere. Practical implications The study has implication for the education and training of IP valuation practitioners. It will also serve as impetus for further study in the area of IP valuation, particularly with respect to measuring valuers’ preparedness, in the developing countries. Originality/value This study presents one of the few attempts at developing a framework for determining preparedness of practitioners for IP valuation in developing countries; a step which is expected to stimulate further actions towards full IP valuation practice.

Property ManagementVol. 43(3)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Obafemi Awolowo University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.