Impact of Phototherapy on Childhood Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Neonatal phototherapy is a widely used and generally safe short-term treatment. This review aims to explore the association between phototherapy and the risk of childhood neoplasia. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted, including cohort or case-control studies that investigated this association. Bias and certainty assessments were performed, utilizing the DerSimonian-Laird model for random-effects analyses. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot, with adjustments made through the trim-and-fill method. A total of 15 studies from nine countries were included, encompassing 7,842,858 individuals, of whom 4.8% received neonatal phototherapy The findings, rated at a medium level of evidence, indicated that those who underwent phototherapy had a 19% increased risk of developing any cancer (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.07-1.32; I² = 0.0%; T² = 0.00). The risk was 22% for hematopoietic malignancies (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.00-1.50) and 31% for leukemia (HR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.26-1.53), with no significant association found for solid tumors, brain tumors, or lymphomas. Moreover, those receiving phototherapy had 44% greater odds of developing any neoplasm (OR 1.44; 95% CI = 1.07-1.93). Despite limitations regarding dosage, duration, and shared risk factors in patients receiving phototherapy, the treatment should be administered according to guidelines to minimize unnecessary exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatology
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179241304925
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Phototherapy on Childhood Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ivana Belanovic-Ramirez, Marcelo Galdós-Bejar, Carlos Baquedano-Rojas, Alipio Orco-León et al.
1 citations
Journal of Neonatology
Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
1.11
article

Impact of Phototherapy on Childhood Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ivana Belanovic-Ramirez, Marcelo Galdós-Bejar, Carlos Baquedano-Rojas, Alipio Orco-León, Valeria Joya-Arista, Jorge Alarcón-Espinosa, Aaron Arrarte-Perez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Neonatal phototherapy is a widely used and generally safe short-term treatment. This review aims to explore the association between phototherapy and the risk of childhood neoplasia. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted, including cohort or case-control studies that investigated this association. Bias and certainty assessments were performed, utilizing the DerSimonian-Laird model for random-effects analyses. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot, with adjustments made through the trim-and-fill method. A total of 15 studies from nine countries were included, encompassing 7,842,858 individuals, of whom 4.8% received neonatal phototherapy The findings, rated at a medium level of evidence, indicated that those who underwent phototherapy had a 19% increased risk of developing any cancer (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.07-1.32; I² = 0.0%; T² = 0.00). The risk was 22% for hematopoietic malignancies (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.00-1.50) and 31% for leukemia (HR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.26-1.53), with no significant association found for solid tumors, brain tumors, or lymphomas. Moreover, those receiving phototherapy had 44% greater odds of developing any neoplasm (OR 1.44; 95% CI = 1.07-1.93). Despite limitations regarding dosage, duration, and shared risk factors in patients receiving phototherapy, the treatment should be administered according to guidelines to minimize unnecessary exposure.

Journal of NeonatologyVol. 39(4)
Peruvian University of Applied Sciences (PE), International Potato Center (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.