Quantitative Indicator for Objective Assessment of Software Process Quality and Performance

A company's software production and product quality can be improved by evaluating the software development process. Artefact inspection is one example of a flawed traditional method that relies on manual qualitative evaluations and is time-consuming, constrained by authority, and frequently subjective. To address these limitations, this study introduces an innovative, semi-automatic method for assessing software processes, leveraging machine learning techniques. We define the problem as a sequence classification challenge that can be effectively tackled using machine learning algorithms. Building on this framework, we develop a new quantitative metric for the objective evaluation of software process efficiency and quality. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we apply it to evaluate the defect management procedures employed in four real-world industrial software projects. Our empirical findings demonstrate that our method is effective and has the potential to deliver reliable, quantitative evaluations of software processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Independent Studies and Research - Computing
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31645/jisrc.24.22.2.4
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Indicator for Objective Assessment of Software Process Quality and Performance

Hira Zafar, Muhammad Adeel Mannan, Jahangir Khan
Journal of Independent Studies and Research - Computing
Software Engineering Research
article

Quantitative Indicator for Objective Assessment of Software Process Quality and Performance

Hira Zafar, Muhammad Adeel Mannan, Jahangir Khan
article en

Abstract

A company's software production and product quality can be improved by evaluating the software development process. Artefact inspection is one example of a flawed traditional method that relies on manual qualitative evaluations and is time-consuming, constrained by authority, and frequently subjective. To address these limitations, this study introduces an innovative, semi-automatic method for assessing software processes, leveraging machine learning techniques. We define the problem as a sequence classification challenge that can be effectively tackled using machine learning algorithms. Building on this framework, we develop a new quantitative metric for the objective evaluation of software process efficiency and quality. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we apply it to evaluate the defect management procedures employed in four real-world industrial software projects. Our empirical findings demonstrate that our method is effective and has the potential to deliver reliable, quantitative evaluations of software processes.

Journal of Independent Studies and Research - ComputingVol. 22(2)
Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (PK), Hamdard University (PK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.