Biting behavior against Varroa mites in honey bees is associated with changes in mandibles, with tracking by a new mobile application for mite damage identification

Abstract Certain populations of feral or wild European Honey Bees (EHB), Apis mellifera , have developed a tolerance of or persistence against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in the USA. Although the grooming or mite-biting behavior is a trait bees use to defend against parasitic Varroa mites, little information is available concerning the grooming or mite-biting behavior of feral EHBs. Accordingly, we observed damaged mites of feral bees in Ohio ( Apis mellifera ligustica ) and commercial bees in four field seasons, 2020 to 2023, as well as feral bees in Kentucky ( A. mellifera mellifera ) in 2023, for a total of 7494 mites. When the mite-biting behavior was compared among these three populations, feral bees of Ohio ( A. m. ligustica ) and Kentucky ( A. m. mellifera ) displayed a significantly higher percentage (22% and 27% more) than the commercial bees. To investigate the mechanism of the mite-biting behavior, we examined bee mandibles. Mandibles are the primary mouthparts and tools used to remove or amputate the Varroa mites. Gentle Africanized honey bees (gAHB, A. mellifera scutellata- hybrid) in Puerto Rican exhibit mite resistance through microevolution on the island. Asian honey bees ( A. cerana ) are the original natural host of V. destructor . However, little has been reported on the morphometric analysis of mandibles between the two species A. cerana and A. mellifera and between the subspecies A. m. scutellata- hybrid and A. m. ligustica . Utilizing X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT), we then examined the three-dimensional morphology of mandibles in (1) A. cerana , (2) gAHB A. m. scutellata- hybrid, (3) Ohio feral A. m. ligustica , and (4) package or commercial colonies A. m. ligustica . Our findings revealed distinctive three-dimensional shapes of mandibles, indicating substantial variations among these populations. These variations suggest that mandible morphology has an integral role in the bee’s defensive mechanisms against parasitic mites. We also developed the first smartphone application to quantify the mite damage by applying artificial intelligence to image analysis. This research contributes valuable insights into the prospective selection and breeding of honey bees with enhanced mite resistance, thus promoting the sustainability of apiculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Apidologie
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-024-01126-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biting behavior against Varroa mites in honey bees is associated with changes in mandibles, with tracking by a new mobile application for mite damage identification

Hongmei Li‐Byarlay, Xaryn L. Cleare, Cao Deng, Shudong Luo et al.
2 citations
Apidologie
Insect and Pesticide Research
1.08
article

Biting behavior against Varroa mites in honey bees is associated with changes in mandibles, with tracking by a new mobile application for mite damage identification

Hongmei Li‐Byarlay, Xaryn L. Cleare, Cao Deng, Shudong Luo, K. A. Young
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Certain populations of feral or wild European Honey Bees (EHB), Apis mellifera , have developed a tolerance of or persistence against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in the USA. Although the grooming or mite-biting behavior is a trait bees use to defend against parasitic Varroa mites, little information is available concerning the grooming or mite-biting behavior of feral EHBs. Accordingly, we observed damaged mites of feral bees in Ohio ( Apis mellifera ligustica ) and commercial bees in four field seasons, 2020 to 2023, as well as feral bees in Kentucky ( A. mellifera mellifera ) in 2023, for a total of 7494 mites. When the mite-biting behavior was compared among these three populations, feral bees of Ohio ( A. m. ligustica ) and Kentucky ( A. m. mellifera ) displayed a significantly higher percentage (22% and 27% more) than the commercial bees. To investigate the mechanism of the mite-biting behavior, we examined bee mandibles. Mandibles are the primary mouthparts and tools used to remove or amputate the Varroa mites. Gentle Africanized honey bees (gAHB, A. mellifera scutellata- hybrid) in Puerto Rican exhibit mite resistance through microevolution on the island. Asian honey bees ( A. cerana ) are the original natural host of V. destructor . However, little has been reported on the morphometric analysis of mandibles between the two species A. cerana and A. mellifera and between the subspecies A. m. scutellata- hybrid and A. m. ligustica . Utilizing X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT), we then examined the three-dimensional morphology of mandibles in (1) A. cerana , (2) gAHB A. m. scutellata- hybrid, (3) Ohio feral A. m. ligustica , and (4) package or commercial colonies A. m. ligustica . Our findings revealed distinctive three-dimensional shapes of mandibles, indicating substantial variations among these populations. These variations suggest that mandible morphology has an integral role in the bee’s defensive mechanisms against parasitic mites. We also developed the first smartphone application to quantify the mite damage by applying artificial intelligence to image analysis. This research contributes valuable insights into the prospective selection and breeding of honey bees with enhanced mite resistance, thus promoting the sustainability of apiculture.

ApidologieVol. 56(1)
Central State University (US), Institute of Apiculture Research (CN)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ohio State University, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Insect and Pesticide Research
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.