Module Creation Within the TOPS Registry: An Opportunity for Longitudinal Collection of Procedure-specific Clinical Outcomes

The Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) data registry, first launched in 2002 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) in collaboration with the Plastic Surgery Foundation (PSF), was designed to avoid the perceived shortcomings of other national data registries as they pertain to interests of the plastic surgery community. Given the diversity of plastic surgery practice, the ASPS and PSF sought to ensure that the TOPS registry platform would support detailed collection of data useful to plastic surgeons practicing in all subspecialties. Therefore, a key design element of the TOPS registry is its ability to incorporate custom-made modules that allow for focused collection of topic/procedure-specific information. Although the TOPS database has collected information on more than 1.6 million plastic surgery procedures and outcomes since its inception more than 20 years ago, only a handful of custom modules have been created. This article outlines the senior author's experience collaborating with the ASPS and PSF to successfully develop and implement a custom module within the TOPS registry. This information serves to promote further awareness, usage, and creation of TOPS modules, as these modules enable assessment of complex clinical conditions by leveraging data collection efforts through the single largest national plastic surgery organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000006397
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Module Creation Within the TOPS Registry: An Opportunity for Longitudinal Collection of Procedure-specific Clinical Outcomes

Umer Qureshi, Taylor G. Hallman, Arun K. Gosain, Ariel E. Figueroa et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Module Creation Within the TOPS Registry: An Opportunity for Longitudinal Collection of Procedure-specific Clinical Outcomes

Umer Qureshi, Taylor G. Hallman, Arun K. Gosain, Ariel E. Figueroa, Kathryn Reisner
article en

Abstract

The Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) data registry, first launched in 2002 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) in collaboration with the Plastic Surgery Foundation (PSF), was designed to avoid the perceived shortcomings of other national data registries as they pertain to interests of the plastic surgery community. Given the diversity of plastic surgery practice, the ASPS and PSF sought to ensure that the TOPS registry platform would support detailed collection of data useful to plastic surgeons practicing in all subspecialties. Therefore, a key design element of the TOPS registry is its ability to incorporate custom-made modules that allow for focused collection of topic/procedure-specific information. Although the TOPS database has collected information on more than 1.6 million plastic surgery procedures and outcomes since its inception more than 20 years ago, only a handful of custom modules have been created. This article outlines the senior author's experience collaborating with the ASPS and PSF to successfully develop and implement a custom module within the TOPS registry. This information serves to promote further awareness, usage, and creation of TOPS modules, as these modules enable assessment of complex clinical conditions by leveraging data collection efforts through the single largest national plastic surgery organization.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 12(12)
Lurie Children's Hospital (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.