Encapsulating Spatially Varying Relationships with a Generalized Additive Model

This paper describes the use of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to create regression models whose coefficient estimates vary with geographic location—spatially varying coefficient (SVC) models. The approach uses Gaussian Process (GP) splines (smooths) for each predictor variable, which are parameterised with observation location in order to generate SVC estimates. These describe the spatially varying relationships between predictor and response variables. The proposed GAM approach was compared with Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) using simulated data with complex spatial heterogeneities. The geographical GP GAM (GGP-GAM) was found to out-perform MGWR across a range of fit metrics and resulted in more accurate coefficient estimates and lower residual errors. One of the GGP-GAM models was investigated in detail to illustrate model diagnostics, checks of spline/smooth convergence and basis evaluations. A larger simulated case study was investigated to explore the trade-offs between GGP-GAM complexity (via the number of knots), performance and computational efficiency. Finally, the GGP-GAM and MGWR approaches were applied to an empirical case study. The resulting models had very similar accuracies and fits and generated subtly different spatially varying coefficient estimates. A number of areas of further work are identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13120459
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encapsulating Spatially Varying Relationships with a Generalized Additive Model

Alexis Comber, Takahiro Yoshida, Daisuke Murakami, Paul Harris et al.
2 citations
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
3.39
article

Encapsulating Spatially Varying Relationships with a Generalized Additive Model

Alexis Comber, Takahiro Yoshida, Daisuke Murakami, Paul Harris, Tomoki Nakaya, Narumasa Tsutsumida, Chris Brunsdon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper describes the use of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to create regression models whose coefficient estimates vary with geographic location—spatially varying coefficient (SVC) models. The approach uses Gaussian Process (GP) splines (smooths) for each predictor variable, which are parameterised with observation location in order to generate SVC estimates. These describe the spatially varying relationships between predictor and response variables. The proposed GAM approach was compared with Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) using simulated data with complex spatial heterogeneities. The geographical GP GAM (GGP-GAM) was found to out-perform MGWR across a range of fit metrics and resulted in more accurate coefficient estimates and lower residual errors. One of the GGP-GAM models was investigated in detail to illustrate model diagnostics, checks of spline/smooth convergence and basis evaluations. A larger simulated case study was investigated to explore the trade-offs between GGP-GAM complexity (via the number of knots), performance and computational efficiency. Finally, the GGP-GAM and MGWR approaches were applied to an empirical case study. The resulting models had very similar accuracies and fits and generated subtly different spatially varying coefficient estimates. A number of areas of further work are identified.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 13(12)
University of Leeds (GB), National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), Tokyo University of Science (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Rothamsted Research (GB), The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP), Saitama University (JP)
Sight Research UK, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.