Gender Differences in Digital Literacy: An Analysis

Abstract. Objective: This study investigates gender differences in various dimensions of digital literacy, including ethical responsibility, general knowledge and functional skills, daily usage, professional production, privacy and security, and social dimensions. Method: We employed a quantitative approach. We used independent samples t-tests to analyze survey data collected from 255 participants, divided into male (m =96) and female (f = 159) groups. The survey included questions across multiple digital literacy dimensions, and the data were assessed for differences in means between genders. Results: The analysis revealed significant gender differences in several dimensions. Specifically, males scored higher in general knowledge and functional skills, as well as in professional production and privacy and security aspects. Females demonstrated higher scores in ethical responsibility and daily usage dimensions. However, no significant differences were observed in the social dimension of digital literacy. Conclusion: The study highlights notable gender-based variations in digital literacy, suggesting that males and females engage differently with digital tools and platforms. with digital tools and platforms differently. These findings have implications for targeted digital literacy programs and educational interventions designed to address specific needs and improve overall digital competency across genders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batı anadolu eğitim bilimleri dergisi
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1562102
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in Digital Literacy: An Analysis

Berna Güryay, Leyla Harputlu
3 citations
Batı anadolu eğitim bilimleri dergisi
Child Development and Digital Technology
6.29
article

Gender Differences in Digital Literacy: An Analysis

Berna Güryay, Leyla Harputlu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Objective: This study investigates gender differences in various dimensions of digital literacy, including ethical responsibility, general knowledge and functional skills, daily usage, professional production, privacy and security, and social dimensions. Method: We employed a quantitative approach. We used independent samples t-tests to analyze survey data collected from 255 participants, divided into male (m =96) and female (f = 159) groups. The survey included questions across multiple digital literacy dimensions, and the data were assessed for differences in means between genders. Results: The analysis revealed significant gender differences in several dimensions. Specifically, males scored higher in general knowledge and functional skills, as well as in professional production and privacy and security aspects. Females demonstrated higher scores in ethical responsibility and daily usage dimensions. However, no significant differences were observed in the social dimension of digital literacy. Conclusion: The study highlights notable gender-based variations in digital literacy, suggesting that males and females engage differently with digital tools and platforms. with digital tools and platforms differently. These findings have implications for targeted digital literacy programs and educational interventions designed to address specific needs and improve overall digital competency across genders.

Batı anadolu eğitim bilimleri dergisiVol. 15(3)
Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hastanesi (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Child Development and Digital Technology
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.