Treatment of High-Grade Chronic Osteomyelitis and Nonunions with PerOssal®: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Patient Perspectives

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Traditional autologous bone grafts as a treatment for bone defects have drawbacks like donor-site morbidity and limited supply. PerOssal<sup>®</sup>, a ceramic bone substitute, may overcome those drawbacks and could offer additional benefits like prolonged, local antibiotic release. This study investigates the clinical and radiological outcomes, including patient-reported outcomes, of using PerOssal<sup>®</sup> in nonunions (NU) and high-grade chronic osteomyelitis (COM). <b>Methods</b>: A single-center, retrospective study, investigating patients treated with PerOssal<sup>®</sup> between January 2020 and December 2023. Collected data include patient characteristics as well as various surgical and outcome parameters including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). <b>Results</b>: A total of 82 patients were analyzed. Reinfection occurred in 19.5% of cases. Osseous integration of PerOssal<sup>®</sup> was achieved in 89% of cases, higher in cavitary defects (91.5%) than segmental defects (72.7%). The revision rate was 32.9%, mainly due to wound healing disorders and reinfections. Mean LEFS score was 53.4 which was heavily influenced by sex (male: 50.7 vs. female: 63.4), revision surgery (no: 55.7 vs. yes: 49.1), reinfection (no: 56.6 vs. yes: 39.4), and osseous integration of PerOssal<sup>®</sup> (yes: 55.8 vs. no: 38.4). <b>Conclusions</b>: PerOssal<sup>®</sup> demonstrates promising outcomes in treating NUs and high-grade COM, especially in cavitary defects, with high osseous integration rates and acceptable functional results. However, reinfection remains a concern, particularly with difficult-to-treat pathogens and extensive surgical histories. Early, comprehensive surgical intervention and tailored antibiotic strategies are essential. Patient selection, defect characteristics, and comorbidities significantly influence success. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247764
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment of High-Grade Chronic Osteomyelitis and Nonunions with PerOssal®: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Patient Perspectives

Paul Alfred Gruetzner, Holger Freischmidt, Jan Siad El Barbari, Jonas Armbruster et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
1.15
article

Treatment of High-Grade Chronic Osteomyelitis and Nonunions with PerOssal®: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Patient Perspectives

Paul Alfred Gruetzner, Holger Freischmidt, Jan Siad El Barbari, Jonas Armbruster, Gregor S. Reiter, Florian Bussmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Traditional autologous bone grafts as a treatment for bone defects have drawbacks like donor-site morbidity and limited supply. PerOssal<sup>®</sup>, a ceramic bone substitute, may overcome those drawbacks and could offer additional benefits like prolonged, local antibiotic release. This study investigates the clinical and radiological outcomes, including patient-reported outcomes, of using PerOssal<sup>®</sup> in nonunions (NU) and high-grade chronic osteomyelitis (COM). <b>Methods</b>: A single-center, retrospective study, investigating patients treated with PerOssal<sup>®</sup> between January 2020 and December 2023. Collected data include patient characteristics as well as various surgical and outcome parameters including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). <b>Results</b>: A total of 82 patients were analyzed. Reinfection occurred in 19.5% of cases. Osseous integration of PerOssal<sup>®</sup> was achieved in 89% of cases, higher in cavitary defects (91.5%) than segmental defects (72.7%). The revision rate was 32.9%, mainly due to wound healing disorders and reinfections. Mean LEFS score was 53.4 which was heavily influenced by sex (male: 50.7 vs. female: 63.4), revision surgery (no: 55.7 vs. yes: 49.1), reinfection (no: 56.6 vs. yes: 39.4), and osseous integration of PerOssal<sup>®</sup> (yes: 55.8 vs. no: 38.4). <b>Conclusions</b>: PerOssal<sup>®</sup> demonstrates promising outcomes in treating NUs and high-grade COM, especially in cavitary defects, with high osseous integration rates and acceptable functional results. However, reinfection remains a concern, particularly with difficult-to-treat pathogens and extensive surgical histories. Early, comprehensive surgical intervention and tailored antibiotic strategies are essential. Patient selection, defect characteristics, and comorbidities significantly influence success. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(24)
Heidelberg University (DE), Klinikum Ludwigshafen (DE)
Universität Heidelberg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.