Test method and coating composition impact on measured moisture vapor transmission rate for waterborne coatings on paper

Moisture vapor barrier is one of the necessary performance attributes for paper packages. Two methods are typically employed to assess the moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR): the gravimetric cup method (ASTM E96) and the MOCON method (ASTM F1249). While those tests have been compared for free standing polymeric films, less is understood about their application in coated paper. Our results show that, despite a general agreement between the two methods, discrepancies exist where test protocols and material properties of coated paper impact the MVTR measurement. The measurement discrepancies can be explained by differences in local moisture concentration. Our study provides new insights on moisture vapor barrier assessment of waterborne coatings on paper and implications for achieving paper packages with improved barrier performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TAPPI Journal
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32964/tj23.11.617
Primary Topic
Material Properties and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test method and coating composition impact on measured moisture vapor transmission rate for waterborne coatings on paper

David Malotky, RAY DRUMRIGHT, K. M. Lusvardi, Brian R. Einsla et al.
TAPPI Journal
Material Properties and Processing
article

Test method and coating composition impact on measured moisture vapor transmission rate for waterborne coatings on paper

David Malotky, RAY DRUMRIGHT, K. M. Lusvardi, Brian R. Einsla, W. N. Mei
article en

Abstract

Moisture vapor barrier is one of the necessary performance attributes for paper packages. Two methods are typically employed to assess the moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR): the gravimetric cup method (ASTM E96) and the MOCON method (ASTM F1249). While those tests have been compared for free standing polymeric films, less is understood about their application in coated paper. Our results show that, despite a general agreement between the two methods, discrepancies exist where test protocols and material properties of coated paper impact the MVTR measurement. The measurement discrepancies can be explained by differences in local moisture concentration. Our study provides new insights on moisture vapor barrier assessment of waterborne coatings on paper and implications for achieving paper packages with improved barrier performance.

TAPPI JournalVol. 23(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Material Properties and Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.