Acknowledging Voices in Architectural Ethnography Architectural Behaviorology / Ethnography of Design Practice

The following text seeks to think critically on the definition of Architectural Ethnography from two different approaches: the architectural and the anthropological. Thus, on one hand, the understanding of architectural ethnography as spatial recording through drawing as the main tool to describe reality; on the other, the sociological approach based on the observation and description of architects practice through the application of STS theory and ANT to the office environment as the main source of knowledge. This piece aims to trace back a bibliographical genealogy of these two different approaches while identifying recent contemporary literature of each in order to precise the nuances of the way they understand and define architectural ethnography. Wether one approach or the other is more or less precise is out of the scope, but the relation between the two and their associated bibliographies might help to expand the field and definitions of architectural ethnography itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cuadernos de Proyectos Arquitectónicos
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20868/cpa.2024.14.5346
Primary Topic
Architecture, Art, Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acknowledging Voices in Architectural Ethnography Architectural Behaviorology / Ethnography of Design Practice

Tomás Rodríguez-Rivero
Cuadernos de Proyectos Arquitectónicos
Architecture, Art, Education
article

Acknowledging Voices in Architectural Ethnography Architectural Behaviorology / Ethnography of Design Practice

Tomás Rodríguez-Rivero
article en

Abstract

The following text seeks to think critically on the definition of Architectural Ethnography from two different approaches: the architectural and the anthropological. Thus, on one hand, the understanding of architectural ethnography as spatial recording through drawing as the main tool to describe reality; on the other, the sociological approach based on the observation and description of architects practice through the application of STS theory and ANT to the office environment as the main source of knowledge. This piece aims to trace back a bibliographical genealogy of these two different approaches while identifying recent contemporary literature of each in order to precise the nuances of the way they understand and define architectural ethnography. Wether one approach or the other is more or less precise is out of the scope, but the relation between the two and their associated bibliographies might help to expand the field and definitions of architectural ethnography itself.

Cuadernos de Proyectos Arquitectónicos(14)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities, Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Architecture, Art, Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acknowledging Voices in Architectural Ethnography Architectural Behaviorology / Ethnography of Design Practice — Tomás Rodríguez-Rivero · Cuadernos de Proyectos Arquitectónicos (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS