Study pace reveals differences in online learning using R-squared analysis

<p>Highly-enrolled fully online lectures and laboratory classes in Anatomy and Physiology, and higher-level Histology courses, were used to calculate R-squared values that could be linked to how the study method chosen by students impacted their exam grades. Student performance on major exams containing only T/F and multiple-choice questions exhibited better exam results, as did the R-squared values for those who studied using tiny quizzes at a slow pace rather than those who studied with them at a fast pace, indicating that learning was done using the flashcard method. There was a difference in grade distribution, with a peak in the A category for the slow pace quiz group, to a peak in the B category for the fast pace group. The use of Respondus with Blackboard also permitted video observation of students following the submission of exams, which did not indicate that any major cheating efforts or use of AI had taken place during major exams. The lack of evidence for cheating or AI usage makes the observation of higher R-squared values from the slow-paced quiz method a significant factor in future online course design.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
e-mentor
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15219/em107.1688
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study pace reveals differences in online learning using R-squared analysis

Michael A. Kolitsky
e-mentor
Online and Blended Learning
article

Study pace reveals differences in online learning using R-squared analysis

Michael A. Kolitsky
article en

Abstract

<p>Highly-enrolled fully online lectures and laboratory classes in Anatomy and Physiology, and higher-level Histology courses, were used to calculate R-squared values that could be linked to how the study method chosen by students impacted their exam grades. Student performance on major exams containing only T/F and multiple-choice questions exhibited better exam results, as did the R-squared values for those who studied using tiny quizzes at a slow pace rather than those who studied with them at a fast pace, indicating that learning was done using the flashcard method. There was a difference in grade distribution, with a peak in the A category for the slow pace quiz group, to a peak in the B category for the fast pace group. The use of Respondus with Blackboard also permitted video observation of students following the submission of exams, which did not indicate that any major cheating efforts or use of AI had taken place during major exams. The lack of evidence for cheating or AI usage makes the observation of higher R-squared values from the slow-paced quiz method a significant factor in future online course design.</p>

e-mentorVol. 107(5)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.