Evaluation of the validity of a perfluorooctane sulfonic acid exposure reconstruction using a measured serum concentration among workers with a wide range of exposure
The model did not predict absolute exposure well, probably because of personal protective equipment use not being accounted for and absorption of PFOS or precursors being lower than modeled. On the other hand, the model did a reasonably good job of ranking the workers' exposure, thus classification of workers according to relative amount of cumulative PFOS-equivalents was reasonably accurate in the study by Alexander et al. (2024) when validated using the measured serum PFOS data.
Authors
- Harvey J. Clewell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-9045)
- Emma M. Rosen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-7565)
- Oyebode A. Taiwo
- Anna K. Porter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-5422)
- Kara L. Andres
- Sarah E. Kleinschmidt
- Sue Chang
- Geary W. Olsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8903-4343)
- Matthew W. Linakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-2395)
- Jerry L. Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5945-3632)
- Perry W. Logan
- Matthew P. Longnecker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-5322)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Annals of Work Exposures and Health
- Published
- 2024-12-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxae099
- Primary Topic
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00