Optimising manufacturing growth: when to decouple from global value chains?

Abstract In this paper, we empirically examine how increasing forward and backward global value chains (GVC) linkages affect manufacturing growth in a set of low- and middle-income countries for the period 1995–2018. Using panel data methodologies of fixed-effects, quantile, and threshold regressions, we find that the relationship between these linkages and manufacturing growth is nonlinear. Our results reveal that there is a positive relationship between backward linkages (BL) and manufacturing growth, but once BL exceed the 11–20% range, the relationship becomes negative. Similarly, FL can drive manufacturing growth up to a certain threshold, beyond which it no longer boosts growth and may even start to reduce it. The negative relationship between GVC linkages and manufacturing growth is attributed to the ‘in–out–in’ theory of GVC participation. Based on these findings, we identify countries that can benefit from increasing GVC participation and those that will benefit from a decoupling from GVCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Economic Development
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-024-00399-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising manufacturing growth: when to decouple from global value chains?

Bishwanath Goldar, Karishma Banga
1 citations
Journal of Social and Economic Development
Global trade and economics
0.83
article

Optimising manufacturing growth: when to decouple from global value chains?

Bishwanath Goldar, Karishma Banga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we empirically examine how increasing forward and backward global value chains (GVC) linkages affect manufacturing growth in a set of low- and middle-income countries for the period 1995–2018. Using panel data methodologies of fixed-effects, quantile, and threshold regressions, we find that the relationship between these linkages and manufacturing growth is nonlinear. Our results reveal that there is a positive relationship between backward linkages (BL) and manufacturing growth, but once BL exceed the 11–20% range, the relationship becomes negative. Similarly, FL can drive manufacturing growth up to a certain threshold, beyond which it no longer boosts growth and may even start to reduce it. The negative relationship between GVC linkages and manufacturing growth is attributed to the ‘in–out–in’ theory of GVC participation. Based on these findings, we identify countries that can benefit from increasing GVC participation and those that will benefit from a decoupling from GVCs.

Journal of Social and Economic DevelopmentVol. 27(S2)
King's College London (GB), Institute of Economic Growth (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Global trade and economics
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimising manufacturing growth: when to decouple from global value chains? — Bishwanath Goldar, Karishma Banga · Journal of Social and Economic Development (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS