Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques

The growing demand for cleaner and more efficient energy solutions has necessitated the development of biomass conversion techniques for hydrogen production. Thermocatalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon directly from methane without CO₂ emission. However, there is the need to optimise this process for better efficiency and improved hydrogen production from biomass sources. In this study, the integration of various machine learning algorithms with Bayesian optimisation, firefly algorithm, Levenberg-Marquardt, and differential evolution techniques were investigated for hydrogen production via thermocatalytic methane decomposition. The key process parameters studied include calcination temperature (450–600 °C), time of calcination (3–8 h), specific surface area (5.4–249 m²/g), and pore volume (0.03–0.48 cm³/g); reduction temperature (500–700 °C), time of reduction (1–5 h), and catalyst weight (0.05–1.00 g). The Bayesian-optimized CatBoost regressor model, with an R² of 96.3% and an RMSE of 0.064 showed the best performance. For the prediction of methane conversion, the Support Vector Regressor (SVR) model optimised with Firefly showed the best performance among other models with an R² value of 95.5% and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.070. CatBoost regressor predicted hydrogen yield of 87% close to the actual yield of 86%. The predicted methane conversion using the firefly-optimized support vector machine regressor was 72%, with the actual conversion being 68%. Model-to-feature relationship studies showed that catalyst weight and calcination time were the strongest predictors of hydrogen yield and methane conversion volume. The study hence established the great opportunity of integration of machine learning models with optimisation techniques in attempts to improve the prediction of hydrogen yield and methane conversion in processes for hydrogen production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Energy
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxener.2024.100229
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques

A. B. Ehinmowo, Bright Ikechukwu Nwaneri, Joseph Oluwatobi Olaide
5 citations
Next Energy
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.53
article

Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques

A. B. Ehinmowo, Bright Ikechukwu Nwaneri, Joseph Oluwatobi Olaide
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The growing demand for cleaner and more efficient energy solutions has necessitated the development of biomass conversion techniques for hydrogen production. Thermocatalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon directly from methane without CO₂ emission. However, there is the need to optimise this process for better efficiency and improved hydrogen production from biomass sources. In this study, the integration of various machine learning algorithms with Bayesian optimisation, firefly algorithm, Levenberg-Marquardt, and differential evolution techniques were investigated for hydrogen production via thermocatalytic methane decomposition. The key process parameters studied include calcination temperature (450–600 °C), time of calcination (3–8 h), specific surface area (5.4–249 m²/g), and pore volume (0.03–0.48 cm³/g); reduction temperature (500–700 °C), time of reduction (1–5 h), and catalyst weight (0.05–1.00 g). The Bayesian-optimized CatBoost regressor model, with an R² of 96.3% and an RMSE of 0.064 showed the best performance. For the prediction of methane conversion, the Support Vector Regressor (SVR) model optimised with Firefly showed the best performance among other models with an R² value of 95.5% and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.070. CatBoost regressor predicted hydrogen yield of 87% close to the actual yield of 86%. The predicted methane conversion using the firefly-optimized support vector machine regressor was 72%, with the actual conversion being 68%. Model-to-feature relationship studies showed that catalyst weight and calcination time were the strongest predictors of hydrogen yield and methane conversion volume. The study hence established the great opportunity of integration of machine learning models with optimisation techniques in attempts to improve the prediction of hydrogen yield and methane conversion in processes for hydrogen production.

Next EnergyVol. 7
University of Lagos (NG)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques — A. B. Ehinmowo, Bright Ikechukwu Nwaneri, et al. · Next Energy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS