Developing evidence for a national strategy for older adults in the criminal justice system: overview of the nominal group approach for this series of brief reports

The number of people aged 50 and over entering the criminal justice system (CJS) in England and Wales is growing. This raises questions as to the suitability of the CJS to equitably accommodate individuals with complex illness or impairment, who might experience difficulties in cognitive function, frailty, and/or impaired mobility. Findings from the government, the third sector, and academic literature have highlighted the difficulties experienced by older adults in the CJS and those tasked with supporting them. To inform the development of the Ministry of Justice's national strategy for older people in prison, we conducted a series of nominal focus groups with policy makers, practitioners, prison staff, representatives from the third sector, and academics, each focusing on a specific topic area that impacts older adults in prison. These were: 1) older adult trajectories; 2) long term conditions; 3) dementia; 4) mental health; 5) social care; 6) end of life care; 7) women; 8) ethnicity; and 9) COVID-19. An additional nominal group was also held with older adults currently in prison to discuss what they thought should be included in the national strategy more broadly. This paper presents the methodology of the nominal groups and subsequent analysis, as well as providing a rationale for the research. It serves as a precursor to a series of papers reporting and discussing the findings of the topic-specific nominal groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2024.2438882
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing evidence for a national strategy for older adults in the criminal justice system: overview of the nominal group approach for this series of brief reports

Matilda Minchin, Thomas Hewson, Louise Robinson, Katrina Forsyth et al.
10 citations
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
11.32
article

Developing evidence for a national strategy for older adults in the criminal justice system: overview of the nominal group approach for this series of brief reports

Matilda Minchin, Thomas Hewson, Louise Robinson, Katrina Forsyth, Evelyn Wong, Anna Newton-Clarke, Dawn Edge, Fiona Lerigo, Leanne Heathcote, Catherine Robinson, Stuart Ware, Kim Barnett, Elizabeth R. Thompson, Jane Senior, Lee D. Mulligan, Jenny Shaw, Kerry Gutridge, Adam O’Neill, Jana Bowden, Rhian Falvey
article en
10 citations

Abstract

The number of people aged 50 and over entering the criminal justice system (CJS) in England and Wales is growing. This raises questions as to the suitability of the CJS to equitably accommodate individuals with complex illness or impairment, who might experience difficulties in cognitive function, frailty, and/or impaired mobility. Findings from the government, the third sector, and academic literature have highlighted the difficulties experienced by older adults in the CJS and those tasked with supporting them. To inform the development of the Ministry of Justice's national strategy for older people in prison, we conducted a series of nominal focus groups with policy makers, practitioners, prison staff, representatives from the third sector, and academics, each focusing on a specific topic area that impacts older adults in prison. These were: 1) older adult trajectories; 2) long term conditions; 3) dementia; 4) mental health; 5) social care; 6) end of life care; 7) women; 8) ethnicity; and 9) COVID-19. An additional nominal group was also held with older adults currently in prison to discuss what they thought should be included in the national strategy more broadly. This paper presents the methodology of the nominal groups and subsequent analysis, as well as providing a rationale for the research. It serves as a precursor to a series of papers reporting and discussing the findings of the topic-specific nominal groups.

Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and PsychologyVol. 36(1)
Ministry of Justice (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Restore (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
11.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.