The Cost-Effectiveness of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer

<i>Objectives.</i> The aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in comparison to routine pelvic lymphadenectomy for lymph node assessment in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). <i>Methods.</i> A decision-analytic model was developed to compare SLN mapping with pelvic lymphadenectomy for guiding adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk endometrioid and non-endometrioid EC, focusing on costs and health outcomes. The input data were obtained from systematic literature searches and expert consensus. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was utilized as the measure of effectiveness. The model was constructed from a healthcare perspective, and the impact of uncertainty was evaluated through sensitivity analyses. <i>Results.</i> The base case analysis indicated that sentinel lymph node mapping is the dominant strategy for lymph node assessment in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer, as it was found to be both more effective and less costly than lymphadenectomy. The improved outcomes and reduced costs associated with SLN mapping primarily result from a decrease in the side effects related to lymph node assessment. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the outcome of the model was robust to variations in input values. <i>Conclusion.</i> SLN mapping is the most cost-effective strategy to determine the need for adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.