Reconsidering mechanisms in social science research: the varied uses of an explanatory metaphor

Abstract This article reconsiders the role of mechanisms in social science research. The study of mechanisms has been recognized as a fundamental task for a methodologically diverse range of social scientific approaches. This raises questions of what roles mechanisms play for causal explanations and if there are uses that are more reasonable than others. To address these questions the article, first, discusses competing arguments for the causal theory underpinning mechanisms. On the basis of these discussions the paper emphasizes the heuristic role of mechanisms as an explanatory devise, serving a crucial role for causal explanations. Secondly, it endeavors to explore the diverse ways mechanisms are employed, especially in contemporary political science research, to highlight limits and benefits with different approaches. The discussion helps reconsider existing fault lines in debates over mechanisms, including the relationship between qualitative and quantitative techniques in empirical research centered on mechanistic explanations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02040-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering mechanisms in social science research: the varied uses of an explanatory metaphor

Ludvig Norman
1 citations
Quality & Quantity
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
1.13
article

Reconsidering mechanisms in social science research: the varied uses of an explanatory metaphor

Ludvig Norman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article reconsiders the role of mechanisms in social science research. The study of mechanisms has been recognized as a fundamental task for a methodologically diverse range of social scientific approaches. This raises questions of what roles mechanisms play for causal explanations and if there are uses that are more reasonable than others. To address these questions the article, first, discusses competing arguments for the causal theory underpinning mechanisms. On the basis of these discussions the paper emphasizes the heuristic role of mechanisms as an explanatory devise, serving a crucial role for causal explanations. Secondly, it endeavors to explore the diverse ways mechanisms are employed, especially in contemporary political science research, to highlight limits and benefits with different approaches. The discussion helps reconsider existing fault lines in debates over mechanisms, including the relationship between qualitative and quantitative techniques in empirical research centered on mechanistic explanations.

Quality & QuantityVol. 59(2)
Stockholm University (SE)
Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.