30+ Years of European Social Dialogue: What Way Forward After the <i>EPSU</i>-Case?

Abstract For 30+ years the European Social Dialogue (ESD) has been an important part of European Union law-making in the field of social policy, which makes it a good moment to look back, but mostly to look forward. The latter, especially after the rulings in the EPSU-case, which were criticised as meaning the end of the European Social Dialogue. The aim of our contribution is therefore to interrogate and assess the future of the ESD through an empirically grounded analyses of ESD and its dynamic relationship to the evolutionary process of European integration. Our conclusion is that in terms of input and output legitimacy, the ESD can improve, especially by building coalitions, and by improving the quality of their output by applying the Better Regulation principles to their agreements. Both activities would lead to the further maturing of their autonomy and might lead to a greater respect for horizontal subsidiarity by the Commission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Law Journal
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwae056
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

30+ Years of European Social Dialogue: What Way Forward After the EPSU-Case?

Beryl ter Haar, Paul Copeland
Industrial Law Journal
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

30+ Years of European Social Dialogue: What Way Forward After the EPSU-Case?

Beryl ter Haar, Paul Copeland
article en

Abstract

Abstract For 30+ years the European Social Dialogue (ESD) has been an important part of European Union law-making in the field of social policy, which makes it a good moment to look back, but mostly to look forward. The latter, especially after the rulings in the EPSU-case, which were criticised as meaning the end of the European Social Dialogue. The aim of our contribution is therefore to interrogate and assess the future of the ESD through an empirically grounded analyses of ESD and its dynamic relationship to the evolutionary process of European integration. Our conclusion is that in terms of input and output legitimacy, the ESD can improve, especially by building coalitions, and by improving the quality of their output by applying the Better Regulation principles to their agreements. Both activities would lead to the further maturing of their autonomy and might lead to a greater respect for horizontal subsidiarity by the Commission.

Industrial Law JournalVol. 54(3)
International Labour Organization (CH), Queen Mary University of London (GB), EU Business School, Geneva (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

30+ Years of European Social Dialogue: What Way Forward After the <i>EPSU</i>-Case? — Beryl ter Haar, Paul Copeland · Industrial Law Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS