Developing Metrics for Evaluating Arts in Medicine Programs

The integration of arts in medicine has gained significant recognition for its ability to enhance healing processes and overall healthcare experiences. However, the lack of standardized metrics for evaluating the efficacy and impact of these programs remains a critical barrier to their broader acceptance and scalability. This paper investigates the development of comprehensive evaluation metrics tailored for arts in medicine programs. It examined the importance of such evaluations, existing methodologies, challenges, and a proposed framework for creating versatile and stakeholder-informed metrics. By addressing limitations such as subjectivity, interdisciplinary variability, and resource constraints, the proposed framework offers a roadmap for piloting and refining evaluative criteria applicable across diverse settings. This effort aims to enhance accountability, foster scalability, and strengthen the role of arts in healthcare systems globally. Keywords: Arts in Medicine, Evaluation Metrics, Program Assessment, Healthcare and Arts Integration, Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IDOSR JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59298/idosrjhss/2024/922023000
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing Metrics for Evaluating Arts in Medicine Programs

Kato Nabirye H.
IDOSR JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Developing Metrics for Evaluating Arts in Medicine Programs

Kato Nabirye H.
article en

Abstract

The integration of arts in medicine has gained significant recognition for its ability to enhance healing processes and overall healthcare experiences. However, the lack of standardized metrics for evaluating the efficacy and impact of these programs remains a critical barrier to their broader acceptance and scalability. This paper investigates the development of comprehensive evaluation metrics tailored for arts in medicine programs. It examined the importance of such evaluations, existing methodologies, challenges, and a proposed framework for creating versatile and stakeholder-informed metrics. By addressing limitations such as subjectivity, interdisciplinary variability, and resource constraints, the proposed framework offers a roadmap for piloting and refining evaluative criteria applicable across diverse settings. This effort aims to enhance accountability, foster scalability, and strengthen the role of arts in healthcare systems globally. Keywords: Arts in Medicine, Evaluation Metrics, Program Assessment, Healthcare and Arts Integration, Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

IDOSR JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCESVol. 9(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing Metrics for Evaluating Arts in Medicine Programs — Kato Nabirye H. · IDOSR JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS