Public perceptions of the US innovation system: moderate support but compelling need for reform

Abstract Science and innovation policy in the USA often frame publics as the beneficiaries of new technologies, but little research has yet engaged publics on their views of the innovation system (IS)—the combined efforts of government, industry, and universities to produce and promote new technologies. Based on a national public survey (n = 3,010), we identify three dimensions of public judgments about the IS with public policy implications: (1) US publics hold moderate confidence in the IS to produce benefits for them and to respond to public input; (2) they are slightly more critical of innovation-related environmental harm and the accrual of benefits to large corporations; and (3) they strongly support reforms to ensure safe, responsible, and affordable technological innovation. Multivariate regressions indicate variance of judgments by social location and worldviews, finding equity and justice aspects particularly salient in views on the IS. We discuss implications for innovation policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae082
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public perceptions of the US innovation system: moderate support but compelling need for reform

Jason Budge, Laura Halcomb, Milind Kandlikar, Barbara Herr Harthorn et al.
2 citations
Science and Public Policy
Risk Perception and Management
2.26
article

Public perceptions of the US innovation system: moderate support but compelling need for reform

Jason Budge, Laura Halcomb, Milind Kandlikar, Barbara Herr Harthorn, Terre Satterfield
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Science and innovation policy in the USA often frame publics as the beneficiaries of new technologies, but little research has yet engaged publics on their views of the innovation system (IS)—the combined efforts of government, industry, and universities to produce and promote new technologies. Based on a national public survey (n = 3,010), we identify three dimensions of public judgments about the IS with public policy implications: (1) US publics hold moderate confidence in the IS to produce benefits for them and to respond to public input; (2) they are slightly more critical of innovation-related environmental harm and the accrual of benefits to large corporations; and (3) they strongly support reforms to ensure safe, responsible, and affordable technological innovation. Multivariate regressions indicate variance of judgments by social location and worldviews, finding equity and justice aspects particularly salient in views on the IS. We discuss implications for innovation policy.

Science and Public PolicyVol. 52(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
National Science Foundation, Michigan State University, Stony Brook University, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, University of California, Santa Barbara, Division of Emerging Frontiers, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Risk Perception and Management
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public perceptions of the US innovation system: moderate support but compelling need for reform — Jason Budge, Laura Halcomb, et al. · Science and Public Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS