Analysis of Program Models of Cognitive Processes Automation

The current definition of the hardware-program implementation defining mathematical models for cognitive-process domains, in other words, announced as the trading-based name "Artificial Intelligence", could raise serious arguments. The main reason for this issue is rooted in the entirely non-engineering aspect in which such models are being presented to the public with an intentional incarnation of non-existent functionality. There is a rising trend of user access and usage of such technology, which reaches nearly 1.8 billion visits per month. Rapidly spreading boundaries of potential application of the trading-based name “аrtificial intelligence” covers vast areas of human activity. It should be denoted that in certain cases a parallel could be made between discoveries made in the exact sciences and the consequences of their incomplete understanding and application – for example, the underestimated risk of radium-226 application, which consequences were wrongly ignored. It is important for humanity not to repeat the same mistake and despite the euphoria of "artificial intelligence", it is necessary to refine the concepts and pay attention to the semantic, generative, and anthropological problems that the invasion of this technology poses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53656/str2024-5s-24-ana
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Program Models of Cognitive Processes Automation

Aneliya Ivanova, Valentin Atanasov
1 citations
Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika
Cognitive Science and Mapping
0.35
article

Analysis of Program Models of Cognitive Processes Automation

Aneliya Ivanova, Valentin Atanasov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The current definition of the hardware-program implementation defining mathematical models for cognitive-process domains, in other words, announced as the trading-based name "Artificial Intelligence", could raise serious arguments. The main reason for this issue is rooted in the entirely non-engineering aspect in which such models are being presented to the public with an intentional incarnation of non-existent functionality. There is a rising trend of user access and usage of such technology, which reaches nearly 1.8 billion visits per month. Rapidly spreading boundaries of potential application of the trading-based name “аrtificial intelligence” covers vast areas of human activity. It should be denoted that in certain cases a parallel could be made between discoveries made in the exact sciences and the consequences of their incomplete understanding and application – for example, the underestimated risk of radium-226 application, which consequences were wrongly ignored. It is important for humanity not to repeat the same mistake and despite the euphoria of "artificial intelligence", it is necessary to refine the concepts and pay attention to the semantic, generative, and anthropological problems that the invasion of this technology poses.

Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata PolitikaVol. 32(5s)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.