O PRINCÍPIO DO FORMALISMO MODERADO COMO FORMA DE CONVALIDAÇÃO DOS VÍCIOS SANÁVEIS CONSTATADOS NOS ATOS PROCEDIMENTAIS LICITATÓRIOS

The principle of moderate formalism in the context of public contracts and tenders seeks to balance the need to follow formal procedures with flexibility to correct errors that do not affect the essence of administrative acts. This means that, when possible, formal errors that do not compromise the public interest or the competitiveness of the process can be validated, that is, corrected without the need to cancel the entire procedure. The Federal Audit Court (TCU), the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the Federal Supreme Court (STF) have recognized this principle as a way of avoiding the annulment of processes due to errors that can be remedied, thus promoting greater efficiency and savings in administrative procedures. The application of this principle must always be in accordance with the Bidding and Contracts Law and the Federal Constitution, ensuring that the public administration acts legally, efficiently and in favor of the public interest. This understanding seeks to ensure that formalism does not become an obstacle to effective public procurement, allowing the focus to be on the substance of administrative acts and not just their form.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista fisio&terapia.
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/fa10202412181217
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O PRINCÍPIO DO FORMALISMO MODERADO COMO FORMA DE CONVALIDAÇÃO DOS VÍCIOS SANÁVEIS CONSTATADOS NOS ATOS PROCEDIMENTAIS LICITATÓRIOS

Jislene Brito Matos Queiroz
Revista fisio&terapia.
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

O PRINCÍPIO DO FORMALISMO MODERADO COMO FORMA DE CONVALIDAÇÃO DOS VÍCIOS SANÁVEIS CONSTATADOS NOS ATOS PROCEDIMENTAIS LICITATÓRIOS

Jislene Brito Matos Queiroz
article en

Abstract

The principle of moderate formalism in the context of public contracts and tenders seeks to balance the need to follow formal procedures with flexibility to correct errors that do not affect the essence of administrative acts. This means that, when possible, formal errors that do not compromise the public interest or the competitiveness of the process can be validated, that is, corrected without the need to cancel the entire procedure. The Federal Audit Court (TCU), the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the Federal Supreme Court (STF) have recognized this principle as a way of avoiding the annulment of processes due to errors that can be remedied, thus promoting greater efficiency and savings in administrative procedures. The application of this principle must always be in accordance with the Bidding and Contracts Law and the Federal Constitution, ensuring that the public administration acts legally, efficiently and in favor of the public interest. This understanding seeks to ensure that formalism does not become an obstacle to effective public procurement, allowing the focus to be on the substance of administrative acts and not just their form.

Revista fisio&terapia.Vol. 29(141)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.