Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Nongeriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology

<h3>Background</h3> Full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) champions a rapid recovery and a low rate of overall complications. However, its efficacy in geriatric patients that might yield additional benefits from minimized invasiveness remains underexplored. <h3>Methods</h3> A multi-institutional prospective cohort study was conducted involving patients undergoing elective lumbar FESS. Participants were categorized into nongeriatric (18–69 years old) and geriatric (≥70 years old) groups. Studied variables included demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A mobile application was leveraged to collect real-time data pre- and postoperatively. <h3>Results</h3> One hundred and sixty-four patients were included and divided into nongeriatric (<i>N</i> = 125) and geriatric (<i>N</i> = 39) cohorts. No group differences were observed between sex (<i>P</i> = 0.404), body mass index (<i>P</i> = 0.372), procedure duration (<i>P</i> = 0.350), or blood loss (<i>P</i> = 0.384). Nongeriatric patients received discectomy more frequently (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), while older patients underwent more decompressive procedures (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Characterization of pain and functional outcome revealed that nongeriatric and geriatric patients follow a similar recovery trajectory and both appreciate significant improvements from baseline to 3 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001 for VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI). There were no differences in the rate of improvement between age groups at any time point (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05 for VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI). <h3>Conclusions</h3> FESS significantly improves pain and function in both geriatric and nongeriatric adults with degenerative lumbar conditions, with no difference in the degree of improvement between groups. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> These findings underscore the efficacy of FESS as a minimally invasive surgical option for elderly patients. Mobile application technology is useful for collecting patient-reported data in spine surgery clinical research. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8693
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Nongeriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology

Rahul A. Sastry, Owen P. Leary, Albert E. Telfeian, Jared Fridley et al.
3 citations
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.27
article

Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Nongeriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology

Rahul A. Sastry, Owen P. Leary, Albert E. Telfeian, Jared Fridley, Osama N. Kashlan, Jannik Leyendecker, Christoph P. Hofstetter, Peter B. Derman, Sanjay Konakondla, Alexander A. Chernysh, Ziya L. Gokaslan, John Ogunlade
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) champions a rapid recovery and a low rate of overall complications. However, its efficacy in geriatric patients that might yield additional benefits from minimized invasiveness remains underexplored. <h3>Methods</h3> A multi-institutional prospective cohort study was conducted involving patients undergoing elective lumbar FESS. Participants were categorized into nongeriatric (18–69 years old) and geriatric (≥70 years old) groups. Studied variables included demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A mobile application was leveraged to collect real-time data pre- and postoperatively. <h3>Results</h3> One hundred and sixty-four patients were included and divided into nongeriatric (<i>N</i> = 125) and geriatric (<i>N</i> = 39) cohorts. No group differences were observed between sex (<i>P</i> = 0.404), body mass index (<i>P</i> = 0.372), procedure duration (<i>P</i> = 0.350), or blood loss (<i>P</i> = 0.384). Nongeriatric patients received discectomy more frequently (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), while older patients underwent more decompressive procedures (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Characterization of pain and functional outcome revealed that nongeriatric and geriatric patients follow a similar recovery trajectory and both appreciate significant improvements from baseline to 3 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001 for VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI). There were no differences in the rate of improvement between age groups at any time point (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05 for VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI). <h3>Conclusions</h3> FESS significantly improves pain and function in both geriatric and nongeriatric adults with degenerative lumbar conditions, with no difference in the degree of improvement between groups. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> These findings underscore the efficacy of FESS as a minimally invasive surgical option for elderly patients. Mobile application technology is useful for collecting patient-reported data in spine surgery clinical research. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 3.

The International Journal of Spine SurgeryVol. 19(1)
University of Cologne (DE), University of Washington (US), Brown University (US), University of Michigan (US), Texas Back Institute (US), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Neurological Surgery (US), Geisinger Neuroscience Institute (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.