Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Nongeriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology
<h3>Background</h3> Full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) champions a rapid recovery and a low rate of overall complications. However, its efficacy in geriatric patients that might yield additional benefits from minimized invasiveness remains underexplored. <h3>Methods</h3> A multi-institutional prospective cohort study was conducted involving patients undergoing elective lumbar FESS. Participants were categorized into nongeriatric (18–69 years old) and geriatric (≥70 years old) groups. Studied variables included demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A mobile application was leveraged to collect real-time data pre- and postoperatively. <h3>Results</h3> One hundred and sixty-four patients were included and divided into nongeriatric (<i>N</i> = 125) and geriatric (<i>N</i> = 39) cohorts. No group differences were observed between sex (<i>P</i> = 0.404), body mass index (<i>P</i> = 0.372), procedure duration (<i>P</i> = 0.350), or blood loss (<i>P</i> = 0.384). Nongeriatric patients received discectomy more frequently (<i>P</i> < 0.001), while older patients underwent more decompressive procedures (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Characterization of pain and functional outcome revealed that nongeriatric and geriatric patients follow a similar recovery trajectory and both appreciate significant improvements from baseline to 3 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI). There were no differences in the rate of improvement between age groups at any time point (<i>P</i> > 0.05 for VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI). <h3>Conclusions</h3> FESS significantly improves pain and function in both geriatric and nongeriatric adults with degenerative lumbar conditions, with no difference in the degree of improvement between groups. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> These findings underscore the efficacy of FESS as a minimally invasive surgical option for elderly patients. Mobile application technology is useful for collecting patient-reported data in spine surgery clinical research. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 3.
Authors
- Rahul A. Sastry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-2179)
- Owen P. Leary (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-828X)
- Albert E. Telfeian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-7112)
- Jared Fridley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-5950)
- Osama N. Kashlan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0088-3912)
- Jannik Leyendecker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4439-4702)
- Christoph P. Hofstetter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-950X)
- Peter B. Derman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-7741)
- Sanjay Konakondla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1343-7327)
- Alexander A. Chernysh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0292-1494)
- Ziya L. Gokaslan
- John Ogunlade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-3270)
Institutions
- University of Cologne (DE)
- University of Washington (US)
- Brown University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Texas Back Institute (US)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
- Neurological Surgery (US)
- Geisinger Neuroscience Institute (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The International Journal of Spine Surgery
- Published
- 2024-12-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.14444/8693
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.27