[Analysis and reflections on the current status of diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma].

The current study aimed to understand the current status and problems of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) in the diagnosis and treatment of hospitals at all levels in China. A multi-center questionnaire survey was conducted in a number of medical institutions across the country. A combination of online questionnaire survey and face-to-face interview was adopted. (1)Pathologists paid more attention than clinicians to distinguish MALT from chronic inflammation (86.3% vs 32.1%, <i>P<</i>0.01) and plasma cell tumor (51.8% vs 23.1%, <i>P<</i>0.01). A total of 21% pathologists never performed B-cell gene rearrangement, 67.6% of clinicians and 69.0% of pathologists would not recommend splenic puncture to diagnose SMZL.(2)In terms of treatment indications, 40.0% of clinicians mistakenly believed that stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ was also a treatment indication. Seventy percent of clinicians reported confusion about treatment indications. (3) In staging and efficacy evaluation, 63.3% of physicians performed PET-CT testing for patients, mainly for resolving clinical staging (89.0%), identifying histologically transformation (79.6%), and determining the site of radiotherapy or biopsy (66.2%). (4) In terms of treatment choice, only 32.2% of patients with indications were recommended for radiotherapy, and the proportion of hematologists choosing radiotherapy was significantly lower than that of oncologists (42.6% vs 71.7%, <i>P</i><0.01); In the anti-HP indications, 53.1% of physicians will perform anti-HP therapy regardless of Hp positive or not; For advanced MZL, first-line immunochemotherapy was selected by 62.7% of clinicians, compared with 37.3% for targeted therapy. (5)15.3% of clinicians believed that the current prognostic evaluation system could not guide the selection of treatment options after initial treatment and recurrence. At present, there are still some cognitive deviations in the disease cognition and treatment indication of MZL among clinicians at all levels of hospitals in China. Likewise, there are still many unmet needs in MZL staging, efficacy evaluation, treatment selection and prognosis evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241012-02311
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Analysis and reflections on the current status of diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma].

Xiaoxing Xiang, Yu Hu, Yan Wang, Bing Lyu et al.
PubMed
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

[Analysis and reflections on the current status of diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma].

Xiaoxing Xiang, Yu Hu, Yan Wang, Bing Lyu, Guohui Cui, H L Peng, Xing Zhang
article en

Abstract

The current study aimed to understand the current status and problems of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) in the diagnosis and treatment of hospitals at all levels in China. A multi-center questionnaire survey was conducted in a number of medical institutions across the country. A combination of online questionnaire survey and face-to-face interview was adopted. (1)Pathologists paid more attention than clinicians to distinguish MALT from chronic inflammation (86.3% vs 32.1%, <i>P<</i>0.01) and plasma cell tumor (51.8% vs 23.1%, <i>P<</i>0.01). A total of 21% pathologists never performed B-cell gene rearrangement, 67.6% of clinicians and 69.0% of pathologists would not recommend splenic puncture to diagnose SMZL.(2)In terms of treatment indications, 40.0% of clinicians mistakenly believed that stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ was also a treatment indication. Seventy percent of clinicians reported confusion about treatment indications. (3) In staging and efficacy evaluation, 63.3% of physicians performed PET-CT testing for patients, mainly for resolving clinical staging (89.0%), identifying histologically transformation (79.6%), and determining the site of radiotherapy or biopsy (66.2%). (4) In terms of treatment choice, only 32.2% of patients with indications were recommended for radiotherapy, and the proportion of hematologists choosing radiotherapy was significantly lower than that of oncologists (42.6% vs 71.7%, <i>P</i><0.01); In the anti-HP indications, 53.1% of physicians will perform anti-HP therapy regardless of Hp positive or not; For advanced MZL, first-line immunochemotherapy was selected by 62.7% of clinicians, compared with 37.3% for targeted therapy. (5)15.3% of clinicians believed that the current prognostic evaluation system could not guide the selection of treatment options after initial treatment and recurrence. At present, there are still some cognitive deviations in the disease cognition and treatment indication of MZL among clinicians at all levels of hospitals in China. Likewise, there are still many unmet needs in MZL staging, efficacy evaluation, treatment selection and prognosis evaluation.

PubMedVol. 104(48)
Central South University (CN), Army Medical University (CN), Xinqiao Hospital (CN), Wuhan Union Hospital (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN), Union Hospital (CN)
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.